2.9 sec in total
491 ms
1.9 sec
494 ms
Click here to check amazing Heathcoat content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about heathcoat.co.uk
World-class, sustainability-focused technical textile manufacturer of market-leading engineered, industrial and apparel fabrics.
Visit heathcoat.co.ukWe analyzed Heathcoat.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 491 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
heathcoat.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value13.2 s
0/100
10%
Value26.5 s
0/100
25%
Value13.2 s
2/100
10%
Value840 ms
34/100
30%
Value0.185
66/100
15%
Value23.5 s
1/100
10%
491 ms
160 ms
164 ms
167 ms
165 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Heathcoat.co.uk, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (657 ms) belongs to the original domain Heathcoat.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 502.9 kB (24%)
2.1 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Heathcoat.co.uk main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.0 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Heathcoat images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 276.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 276.8 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 178.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Heathcoat.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 178.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (54%)
63
29
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Heathcoat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
heathcoat.co.uk
491 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
160 ms
imageslider.css
164 ms
jcemediabox.css
167 ms
style.css
165 ms
bootstrap.css
578 ms
default.css
167 ms
template.css
242 ms
touch.gallery.css
244 ms
responsive.css
247 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
173 ms
slider.css
171 ms
template.css
249 ms
superfish.css
169 ms
superfish-navbar.css
170 ms
superfish-vertical.css
170 ms
jquery.min.js
499 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
321 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
323 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
409 ms
caption.js
328 ms
jcemediabox.js
522 ms
jquery.mobile.customized.min.js
488 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
413 ms
bootstrap.js
657 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
619 ms
touch.gallery.js
618 ms
scripts.js
619 ms
jquery.bxslider.custom.js
330 ms
jquery.mobile.customized.min.js
327 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.min.js
251 ms
superfish.js
251 ms
jquery.mobilemenu.js
251 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.js
255 ms
supersubs.js
331 ms
sftouchscreen.js
328 ms
bg_body.jpg
656 ms
analytics.js
10 ms
bg_menu.png
253 ms
menu_border.gif
112 ms
heathcoat-logo.jpg
169 ms
slider-7.jpg
335 ms
slider_3.jpg
179 ms
slider_2.jpg
262 ms
slider-6.jpg
411 ms
en.gif
264 ms
es.gif
332 ms
de.gif
342 ms
fr.gif
344 ms
logobar_a.jpg
427 ms
logobar_b.jpg
427 ms
logobar_c.jpg
428 ms
logobar_d.jpg
429 ms
logobar_g.jpg
497 ms
logobar_e.jpg
501 ms
logobar_f.jpg
501 ms
collect
70 ms
search_icon.gif
472 ms
popup.html
407 ms
tooltip.html
478 ms
bx_loader.gif
86 ms
controls.png
84 ms
bg_footer.png
646 ms
up-arrow.png
483 ms
heathcoat.co.uk accessibility score
heathcoat.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Heathcoat.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Heathcoat.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
heathcoat.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Heathcoat. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: