2.6 sec in total
251 ms
2.1 sec
233 ms
Click here to check amazing Historic Rail content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about historicrail.com
Visit historicrail.comWe analyzed Historicrail.com page load time and found that the first response time was 251 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
historicrail.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value19.5 s
0/100
25%
Value9.0 s
14/100
10%
Value860 ms
33/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value14.4 s
9/100
10%
251 ms
579 ms
158 ms
160 ms
172 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Historicrail.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Historicaviation.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (954 ms) belongs to the original domain Historicrail.com.
Page size can be reduced by 503.0 kB (17%)
2.9 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Historicrail.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.2 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 130.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Historic Rail images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 254.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 254.5 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 70.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Historicrail.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 70.3 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (28%)
58
42
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Historic Rail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
historicrail.com
251 ms
www.historicrail.com
579 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
158 ms
font-awesome.css
160 ms
fonts.css
172 ms
topnav.css
173 ms
sidenav.css
182 ms
storestyle.css
185 ms
footernav.css
234 ms
design.css
237 ms
style.css
257 ms
jquery.min.js
6 ms
dropit.js
183 ms
application.js
193 ms
SwiftypeComponents.js
553 ms
configuration.js
238 ms
aEzzzc3-8kFxYwMXXAEJ.js
19 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
239 ms
homeslide.js
252 ms
analytics.js
21 ms
DownloadCatalog.jpg
297 ms
logo.png
264 ms
HistoricRailandRoadsMotorStylesLogo.png
86 ms
logo.png
247 ms
bg_header-wrap.jpg
88 ms
HistoricRailandRoadsMotorStylesLogo.png
195 ms
btn_go.gif
124 ms
HRWinter2016Cover.jpg
453 ms
484FEF3_slider.jpg
583 ms
FlyingScotsman_slider.jpg
520 ms
HO_Vehicles_Slider.jpg
510 ms
MackR_Slider.jpg
562 ms
0R78841.jpg
468 ms
clear.gif
519 ms
0R04339.jpg
561 ms
0R74384-large.jpg
740 ms
0R74825-large.jpg
672 ms
0R05823.jpg
687 ms
0R62065-large.jpg
654 ms
0R61060.jpg
656 ms
0R66797.jpg
667 ms
0R76116.jpg
746 ms
0R88036.jpg
748 ms
0R78184-large.jpg
922 ms
K665013-large.jpg
751 ms
0R86376.jpg
855 ms
0R04166.jpg
818 ms
0RV3206.jpg
839 ms
0R05943.jpg
841 ms
JTC.jpg
828 ms
HotNewProducts.png
895 ms
RequestYourCatalog.png
907 ms
FB.jpg
930 ms
Twitter.jpg
931 ms
gtm.js
55 ms
collect
17 ms
footer-bg.gif
887 ms
PTN57F-webfont.woff
904 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
917 ms
PTN77F-webfont.woff
937 ms
collect
61 ms
garagegothic-bold-webfont.woff
952 ms
HistoricRailandRoadsMotorStylesLogo.png
954 ms
logo.png
217 ms
logo.png
296 ms
cc
80 ms
bx_loader.gif
584 ms
HRWinter2016Cover.jpg
677 ms
search.json
240 ms
historicrail.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
historicrail.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
historicrail.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Historicrail.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Historicrail.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
historicrail.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Historic Rail. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: