3.4 sec in total
264 ms
2.2 sec
957 ms
Click here to check amazing History Discussion content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about historydiscussion.net
Learn about World History, Indian History, Study Notes on History and Essays.
Visit historydiscussion.netWe analyzed Historydiscussion.net page load time and found that the first response time was 264 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
historydiscussion.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value3.6 s
60/100
25%
Value6.4 s
40/100
10%
Value2,600 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value15.6 s
6/100
10%
264 ms
28 ms
12 ms
43 ms
44 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Historydiscussion.net, 32% (18 requests) were made to Cdn.historydiscussion.net and 11% (6 requests) were made to Images.taboola.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (522 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (67%)
1.5 MB
489.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Historydiscussion.net main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 865.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 297.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 297.7 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 127 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. History Discussion images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 589.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 589.8 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 123.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Historydiscussion.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 123.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (54%)
56
26
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of History Discussion. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.historydiscussion.net
264 ms
shareaholic.js
28 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
12 ms
devices.css
43 ms
styles.css
44 ms
style.css
45 ms
style.css
48 ms
layout.css
57 ms
jquery.js
61 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
55 ms
third-party.js
81 ms
modernizr.js
80 ms
general.js
86 ms
shortcodes.css
84 ms
custom.css
90 ms
adsbygoogle.js
12 ms
jquery.form.min.js
122 ms
scripts.js
121 ms
jquery.equalizer.js
123 ms
wp-embed.min.js
123 ms
659983b6fb6a503852172478c7597582.json
166 ms
loader.js
83 ms
sdk.js
384 ms
logo_his_583cdf3e48cd611a130f3ac2c3b17e58.jpg
71 ms
counter.js
62 ms
smbg.png
59 ms
logo_hisory.jpg
59 ms
ca-pub-0989790830026725.js
489 ms
zrt_lookup.html
522 ms
show_ads_impl.js
392 ms
t.php
483 ms
analytics.js
434 ms
shrMain.min.js
120 ms
impl.198-RELEASE.js
196 ms
beacon.js
194 ms
pla
90 ms
229 ms
collect
83 ms
jquery.min.js
181 ms
xd_arbiter.php
128 ms
xd_arbiter.php
256 ms
ads
345 ms
json
161 ms
osd.js
121 ms
pageview.gif
94 ms
3215409350997732930
144 ms
abg.js
126 ms
m_js_controller.js
135 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
176 ms
WTqBH_cash_and_card_pocket.jpg
61 ms
cbcf666c322225f46c2a60b02c81be86.jpg
72 ms
b416cef1a3ae273dd4de5910fa01310a.png
72 ms
Cashews.jpg
20 ms
a3f9648ba94ff53e47e3fb3f68dc75fa.jpg
53 ms
3be6f9744d2f847a4c1e46d356d335d3.jpg
56 ms
x_button_blue2.png
47 ms
s
42 ms
historydiscussion.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
historydiscussion.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
historydiscussion.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Historydiscussion.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Historydiscussion.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
historydiscussion.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of History Discussion. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: