18.1 sec in total
422 ms
7.2 sec
10.5 sec
Click here to check amazing Home Journal content for Taiwan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about homejournal.com
Home Journal discovers the most inspirational interior design, home décor, latest trends and developments in design and architecture.
Visit homejournal.comWe analyzed Homejournal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 422 ms and then it took 17.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
homejournal.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.3 s
0/100
10%
Value52.6 s
0/100
25%
Value29.8 s
0/100
10%
Value1,830 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.446
20/100
15%
Value44.1 s
0/100
10%
422 ms
763 ms
835 ms
845 ms
1047 ms
Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Homejournal.com, 36% (39 requests) were made to Img.homejournal.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) relates to the external source Img.homejournal.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.6 MB (10%)
27.0 MB
24.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Homejournal.com main page is 27.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 25.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 68.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.8 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.0 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Home Journal images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 209.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 209.9 kB or 24% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 278.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Homejournal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 278.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (28%)
99
71
The browser has sent 99 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Home Journal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
homejournal.com
422 ms
763 ms
jquery-3.5.1.min.js
835 ms
popper.min.js
845 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1047 ms
slick.min.js
1053 ms
ResizeSensor.min.js
632 ms
sticky-sidebar.min.js
631 ms
app.min.js
1261 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1471 ms
all.min.css
1252 ms
slick.min.css
1051 ms
app.min.css
1464 ms
gpt.js
56 ms
js
71 ms
OneSignalSDK.js
1256 ms
embed.js
105 ms
pubads_impl.js
31 ms
fbevents.js
135 ms
f07fd26e2a1e8e95314a842ca.js
220 ms
65b210f69ad71.png
2449 ms
65b21124a0f36.png
2644 ms
65af92d3210ea.png
2710 ms
65b3dab89f89d.jpg
1883 ms
65b3dac0b9e64.jpg
1874 ms
65af8edcebf52.jpg
1875 ms
65b32c87edb31.png
2712 ms
65aa19995bd3a.JPG
2292 ms
65aa206644b98.png
2938 ms
hj_logo_head.png
410 ms
hj_logo_head_mobile.png
579 ms
hj_logo.png
409 ms
search.png
410 ms
fb.png
408 ms
ig.png
408 ms
pinterest.png
613 ms
youtube.png
614 ms
mail.png
614 ms
nav_lang_zh.png
614 ms
lang_zh.png
613 ms
lang_en.png
727 ms
adc_entrance.png
1639 ms
hs_entrance.png
1430 ms
bg_entrance.png
1876 ms
hj_logo_white.png
827 ms
close.png
827 ms
ProximaNova-Regular.otf
1105 ms
MADE-Coachella-Regular.otf
1435 ms
MADE-Coachella-Light.otf
1016 ms
ads
230 ms
container.html
110 ms
65a5034f083f2.jpg
2421 ms
65adf47120c3e.png
2578 ms
65b0c5cff0e0f.jpg
2632 ms
65ae405b9ed19.jpg
2972 ms
65a6431573230.jpg
2786 ms
65a7596fa95a1.jpg
2838 ms
culture.ttf
1163 ms
65a652fd95629.jpg
2832 ms
6597c1d58cdd8.jpg
2832 ms
659689710bb81.jpg
2985 ms
65953407d76da.jpg
3041 ms
65a65b5071ad6.jpg
3033 ms
659cd160506ee.png
3452 ms
65943d29c7b05.jpg
3048 ms
65806a4028b2d.jpg
3159 ms
65a54c5fd6a63.jpg
3183 ms
65962f0078ce4.jpg
3242 ms
655ed19d71059.jpg
3244 ms
6540d0c20c67e.jpg
3260 ms
651e6f83b6fc3.png
3777 ms
65155a3b22958.png
3601 ms
64ffefa240153.jpg
3453 ms
65a50404b6541.jpg
3453 ms
656d90874b8ca.jpg
3472 ms
6566f49ce871e.jpg
3660 ms
65431284b2054.jpg
3665 ms
65a50c560bc8e.jpg
3665 ms
659d180712d87.jpg
3683 ms
culture-bold.ttf
1445 ms
dd863d71-0b4b-42ab-afb5-5654def6a31c.js
125 ms
hotjar-2356877.js
166 ms
ads
62 ms
ads
153 ms
embed.js
22 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1246 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1421 ms
modules.f7c079ad889f2e18ab73.js
129 ms
ext.js
45 ms
adsbygoogle.js
200 ms
ufs_web_display.js
73 ms
abg_lite.js
34 ms
window_focus.js
35 ms
7935669008951278911
169 ms
show_ads_impl.js
82 ms
zrt_lookup.html
16 ms
activeview
136 ms
ads
107 ms
sodar
51 ms
sodar2.js
5 ms
runner.html
13 ms
aframe
56 ms
IHSjRKKj3q_1Pt3c2sGWHmUCy_Bw5n5yhKh9CWyZSw4.js
3 ms
352 ms
659e1c38556be.jpg
2036 ms
659ecb0b8e256.jpg
2098 ms
65952082456e6.jpg
2096 ms
activeview
125 ms
homejournal.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
homejournal.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
homejournal.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Homejournal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Homejournal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
homejournal.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Home Journal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: