1.8 sec in total
13 ms
846 ms
985 ms
Click here to check amazing Honeycomb content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about honeycomb.buzz
Looking for the top SEO agency? 3x SEO Agency of the Year, we can help improve your search engine optimization with our custom services. ✓ Get started today!
Visit honeycomb.buzzWe analyzed Honeycomb.buzz page load time and found that the first response time was 13 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
honeycomb.buzz performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
33/100
10%
Value7.3 s
5/100
25%
Value4.7 s
69/100
10%
Value1,910 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value9.0 s
33/100
10%
13 ms
41 ms
40 ms
116 ms
61 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Honeycomb.buzz, 73% (36 requests) were made to Victorious.com and 18% (9 requests) were made to Cdn.shortpixel.ai. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (455 ms) relates to the external source Victorious.com.
Page size can be reduced by 356.2 kB (58%)
617.4 kB
261.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Honeycomb.buzz main page is 617.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 429.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 351.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 351.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 184 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Honeycomb.buzz has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (73%)
45
12
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Honeycomb. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
honeycomb.buzz
13 ms
victoriousseo.com
41 ms
victoriousseo.com
40 ms
victorious.com
116 ms
front.used.css
61 ms
post-5.css
73 ms
animations.min.css
68 ms
style.css
59 ms
swiper.min.css
66 ms
frontend.css
69 ms
post-39.css
109 ms
post-34.css
132 ms
post-101.css
107 ms
jquery.min.js
121 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
115 ms
widget-mega-menu.min.css
124 ms
v2.js
63 ms
post-15976.css
297 ms
script.js
298 ms
lazyload.min.js
318 ms
seopress-cookies.min.js
318 ms
seopress-cookies-ajax.min.js
318 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
318 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
317 ms
jquery-numerator.min.js
317 ms
jet-plugins.js
399 ms
frontend.js
439 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
399 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
398 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
398 ms
hooks.min.js
398 ms
i18n.min.js
410 ms
frontend.min.js
410 ms
waypoints.min.js
410 ms
core.min.js
417 ms
frontend.min.js
415 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
455 ms
jet-tabs-frontend.min.js
454 ms
victorious-logo.svg
257 ms
home-hero-image.webp
381 ms
home-hero-badge.webp
243 ms
awards-stat.webp
243 ms
clutch-stat.webp
272 ms
team-stat.webp
271 ms
google-stat.webp
266 ms
clients-stat.webp
401 ms
waves-smoke.svg
245 ms
yellow-linework.svg
149 ms
4dfcaa783206.google-fonts.min.css
48 ms
honeycomb.buzz accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
honeycomb.buzz best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
honeycomb.buzz SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Honeycomb.buzz can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Honeycomb.buzz main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
honeycomb.buzz
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Honeycomb. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: