4.1 sec in total
233 ms
2.5 sec
1.4 sec
Click here to check amazing Honeycomb content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about honeycomb.buzz
Looking for the top SEO agency? 3x SEO Agency of the Year, we can help improve your search engine optimization with our custom services. ✓ Get started today!
Visit honeycomb.buzzWe analyzed Honeycomb.buzz page load time and found that the first response time was 233 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
honeycomb.buzz performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
28/100
10%
Value11.1 s
0/100
25%
Value26.1 s
0/100
10%
Value10,040 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.969
2/100
15%
Value16.1 s
6/100
10%
233 ms
49 ms
99 ms
94 ms
103 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Honeycomb.buzz, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Honeycomb.buzz.
Page size can be reduced by 583.7 kB (17%)
3.4 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Honeycomb.buzz main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 191.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 191.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 318.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Honeycomb needs image optimization as it can save up to 318.3 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 50.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 50.5 kB or 21% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Honeycomb.buzz needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.4 kB or 15% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (37%)
67
42
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Honeycomb. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
honeycomb.buzz
233 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
49 ms
style.min.css
99 ms
styles.css
94 ms
rgs.css
103 ms
font-awesome.min.css
93 ms
style.css
197 ms
prettyPhoto.css
91 ms
responsive.css
122 ms
nectar-slider.css
116 ms
js_composer.min.css
150 ms
honeycomb.buzz
452 ms
css
41 ms
jquery.min.js
188 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
179 ms
modernizr.js
179 ms
443925.js
90 ms
scripts.js
175 ms
prettyPhoto.js
303 ms
superfish.js
302 ms
init.js
283 ms
nectar-slider.js
280 ms
comment-reply.min.js
279 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
281 ms
v2.js
152 ms
analytics.js
337 ms
Honeycomb-v5_transparent.png
261 ms
Honeycomb-v5_transparent-1.png
262 ms
master-logo-white.png
256 ms
master-logo-whitex2.png
256 ms
grayscale_image-6.png
253 ms
grayscale_image-4.png
254 ms
grayscale_image-1.png
260 ms
grayscale_image-3.png
257 ms
grayscale_image-7-1.png
257 ms
grayscale_image-5.png
259 ms
grayscale_image-2.png
355 ms
grayscale_image.png
356 ms
methodology-02.png
827 ms
case-studies-02.png
829 ms
iStock-512154958-Converted-02-1.png
816 ms
ihub-logo.png
358 ms
inspirehub-results.png
357 ms
karolyn-hart.png
826 ms
8533418d-adf6-41c7-9b81-0a413f527052-1466794090618.png
820 ms
Screenshot-2017-02-24-10.57.01-1.png
828 ms
green-bits-1.png
832 ms
victorious-office.jpg
1213 ms
badge-hubspot-gold.png
847 ms
kyletees-headshot.png
850 ms
cory-teese-headshot-01-1.png
847 ms
brian-barela-headshot-small.png
1214 ms
danbirch-headshot.png
848 ms
houston-headshot-01.png
1214 ms
michaeltranson-headshot-02-e1491597529505.png
1217 ms
laptop-asana-1.png
1276 ms
master-logo-white-2.png
1216 ms
json
588 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
570 ms
Lovelo_Black.woff
1019 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf
573 ms
icomoon.woff
1019 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
1018 ms
collect
888 ms
443925.js
885 ms
443925.js
1019 ms
json
445 ms
diagonal_line.png
67 ms
grid.png
187 ms
honeycomb.buzz
67 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
91 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
90 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
96 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
91 ms
OpenSansBold-webfont.woff
96 ms
code-design-bg.jpg
202 ms
mountains-preview2.jpg
197 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
36 ms
honeycomb.buzz accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
honeycomb.buzz best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
honeycomb.buzz SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Honeycomb.buzz can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Honeycomb.buzz main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
honeycomb.buzz
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Honeycomb. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: