2.8 sec in total
190 ms
2.3 sec
300 ms
Click here to check amazing Hornbill content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about hornbill.net
Hornbill's Platform and Collaborative Business Applications help you lead the way with Digital Transformation
Visit hornbill.netWe analyzed Hornbill.net page load time and found that the first response time was 190 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
hornbill.net performance score
190 ms
441 ms
73 ms
84 ms
118 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Hornbill.net, 74% (52 requests) were made to Wstatic.hornbill.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Wstatic.hornbill.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (50%)
2.4 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Hornbill.net main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 840.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.1 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hornbill images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 545.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 545.5 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 590.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hornbill.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 590.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (21%)
61
48
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hornbill. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
hornbill.net
190 ms
www.hornbill.com
441 ms
css
73 ms
484668c6021235937e2d1a4aa53d823a.css
84 ms
54827cf6ce0213dfebab42fcfb5f7af5.css
118 ms
b999aa43ba78f1aecab8d6becc6a054c.css
142 ms
fb0602929b477acb96a740b26f6101c0.js
136 ms
conversion_async.js
67 ms
conversion.js
65 ms
03b4ddb13f6b2ab851e9de005ba81ce6.js
132 ms
cc66a6f864922236bc46053f73172ff6.js
311 ms
api.js
129 ms
analytics.js
245 ms
tracker.js
538 ms
index.php
1111 ms
logo.png
119 ms
hornbill-service-manager.png
1323 ms
caa6d-52323-stock-photo-a-handcuffed-businessman-in-jail-holding-bars-isolated-on-white-61205962.jpg
188 ms
4617f-c3352-stock-photo-ice-cubes-and-basil-leaves-isolated-on-white-background-327511037.jpg
120 ms
32e68-e301c-stock-photo-teamwork-team-connection-strategy-partnership-support-puzzle-concept-245636632.jpg
120 ms
service-manager.jpg
131 ms
collaboration.jpg
130 ms
document-manager.jpg
179 ms
customer-manager.jpg
131 ms
YouTube_thumnbnail_Promo_video_sm.png
133 ms
YouTube_thumnbnail_Hornbill_video2.png
146 ms
faces.jpg
145 ms
gridtile.png
180 ms
hfrs_gill_lee.png
147 ms
hfrs_katie_collard.png
178 ms
avdc_adam_haylock.png
178 ms
avdc_karen_russell_sertees.png
184 ms
idbs_helen_waterman.png
178 ms
avdc.png
178 ms
idbs.png
180 ms
jakemp.png
179 ms
benenden.png
178 ms
brent.png
179 ms
cornwall.png
179 ms
delta.png
180 ms
derwent.png
179 ms
enserve_sm.png
179 ms
guinness.png
180 ms
hampshir_sm.png
1185 ms
havering.png
179 ms
hfw.png
180 ms
idox_sm.png
180 ms
integra.png
181 ms
marksclerk.png
180 ms
recaptcha__en.js
139 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
182 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTZS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
128 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
139 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSpS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
138 ms
Simple-Line-Icons.woff
111 ms
15 ms
mole_sm.png
71 ms
nmdlogo.png
88 ms
syspro.png
1064 ms
collect
19 ms
tresham.png
76 ms
wbc.png
77 ms
westminster.png
77 ms
westsuffolk.png
92 ms
ww_sm.png
63 ms
collect
60 ms
Hornbill_logo_lrg_white_sm.png
76 ms
map-img.png
47 ms
ga-audiences
19 ms
108 ms
hornbill.net SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hornbill.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hornbill.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hornbill.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hornbill. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: