893 ms in total
41 ms
635 ms
217 ms
Click here to check amazing Hostinger content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about hostinger.in
Choose your web hosting solution and make the perfect website! From shared hosting and domains to VPS - we have all you need for online success.
Visit hostinger.inWe analyzed Hostinger.in page load time and found that the first response time was 41 ms and then it took 852 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
hostinger.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value4.7 s
34/100
25%
Value3.2 s
92/100
10%
Value2,600 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.018
100/100
15%
Value11.6 s
18/100
10%
41 ms
53 ms
11 ms
84 ms
107 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Hostinger.in, 16% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (180 ms) relates to the external source Staticxx.facebook.com.
Page size can be reduced by 137.8 kB (47%)
293.1 kB
155.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Hostinger.in main page is 293.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 123.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.2 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.9 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Hostinger needs image optimization as it can save up to 14.8 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 47.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 47.7 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hostinger.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 53.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (31%)
39
27
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hostinger. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
hostinger.in
41 ms
www.hostinger.in
53 ms
main.css
11 ms
css
84 ms
plusone.js
107 ms
jquery.min.js
55 ms
all.js
131 ms
jquery.main.js
18 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
86 ms
analytics.js
52 ms
logo-in.png
50 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
52 ms
fastbutton
105 ms
fb-small.png
12 ms
google-small.png
48 ms
background-light.png
48 ms
robot.jpg
46 ms
home_1.jpg
47 ms
home_2.jpg
12 ms
home_3.jpg
45 ms
home_4.jpg
47 ms
home_5.jpg
49 ms
home_6.jpg
49 ms
footer-logos-all.jpg
48 ms
footer-links-bg.gif
49 ms
footer_icann_logo.png
48 ms
staff-member-about-baloon.png
71 ms
footer_hostinger_logo.png
70 ms
102 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
143 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
176 ms
xd_arbiter.php
100 ms
xd_arbiter.php
180 ms
collect
31 ms
postmessageRelay
99 ms
collect
119 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
52 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
66 ms
like.php
60 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
85 ms
api.js
60 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
85 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
76 ms
vpc6VNjRPXV.js
148 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
161 ms
hostinger.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
hostinger.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
hostinger.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hostinger.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Hostinger.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hostinger.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hostinger. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: