5.1 sec in total
280 ms
4.4 sec
438 ms
Visit hostlife.net now to see the best up-to-date HOSTLIFE content for Ukraine and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hostlife.net
European hosting provider HOSTLIFE -
Visit hostlife.netWe analyzed Hostlife.net page load time and found that the first response time was 280 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
hostlife.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
58/100
10%
Value8.1 s
2/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value1,440 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.152
75/100
15%
Value8.2 s
41/100
10%
280 ms
655 ms
61 ms
79 ms
200 ms
Our browser made a total of 139 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (116 requests) were addressed to the original Hostlife.net, 4% (5 requests) were made to Cdn.jivosite.com and 3% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (906 ms) belongs to the original domain Hostlife.net.
Page size can be reduced by 459.2 kB (22%)
2.0 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Hostlife.net main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 87.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. HOSTLIFE images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 140.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 140.8 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 198.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hostlife.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 198.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (15%)
132
112
The browser has sent 132 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of HOSTLIFE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
hostlife.net
280 ms
www.hostlife.net
655 ms
css
61 ms
css
79 ms
common.css
200 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
432 ms
jquery.cookie.js
254 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
297 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
384 ms
common.js
298 ms
main.js
301 ms
analytics.js
151 ms
watch.js
141 ms
hosting101.png
621 ms
get_logo.php
350 ms
170-1-green.png
882 ms
55
649 ms
1878.png
534 ms
all_bg.png
215 ms
toolbar.png
213 ms
tel_1.png
211 ms
open_m.png
229 ms
cash_1.png
211 ms
flag_1.png
211 ms
soc_2.png
318 ms
soc_3.png
318 ms
logo.png
405 ms
v_brd_1.png
318 ms
medal.png
407 ms
menu_bg.png
318 ms
m_brd.png
400 ms
icon_home.png
410 ms
slide_bg.png
399 ms
promo_12.png
616 ms
g_brd_2.png
494 ms
slide_more.png
493 ms
promo_10.png
752 ms
slide_price.png
496 ms
promo_11.png
780 ms
promo_7.png
824 ms
choice_bg.png
660 ms
digit.png
578 ms
g_brd_1.png
664 ms
flag_ua.png
697 ms
price.png
743 ms
flag_ru.png
747 ms
flag_de.png
781 ms
flag_nl.png
829 ms
icon_adv_1.png
830 ms
icon_adv_2.png
834 ms
ac_1.png
863 ms
flag_us.png
862 ms
icon_adv_3.png
906 ms
IgNqRr1xo5
493 ms
icon_adv_9.png
808 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xNDLSy1PIjjNvoQ-H5eYV74.ttf
36 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xHEHffx_y3ihZ-lRogfrVBY.ttf
59 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzGeP1y_Bkidl4ESyB_O2G_c.ttf
70 ms
K88pR3goAWT7BTt32Z01m6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
95 ms
collect
13 ms
ac_2.png
709 ms
icon_adv_4.png
712 ms
icon_adv_6.png
739 ms
icon_glob.png
739 ms
sub_arrow.png
767 ms
v_brd_2.png
757 ms
icon_more_2.png
686 ms
g_brd_4.png
689 ms
ac_1.jpg
716 ms
ac_2.jpg
715 ms
ssl_1.png
675 ms
ssl_2.png
676 ms
ssl_3.png
683 ms
ssl_4.png
686 ms
ssl_5.png
706 ms
ssl_more.png
622 ms
host_1.png
664 ms
host_2.png
667 ms
widget_ru_RU.js
393 ms
host_3.png
592 ms
host_4.png
560 ms
host_5.png
538 ms
host_6.png
535 ms
pp_1.png
542 ms
pp_2.png
500 ms
pp_3.png
514 ms
pp_4.png
507 ms
pp_5.png
503 ms
pp_6.png
503 ms
pp_7.png
529 ms
pp_8.png
525 ms
pp_9.png
527 ms
pp_10.png
524 ms
pp_11.png
505 ms
pp_12.png
502 ms
pp_13.png
529 ms
pp_14.png
525 ms
pp_15.png
529 ms
pp_16.png
524 ms
pp_17.png
503 ms
pp_18.png
504 ms
pp_19.png
530 ms
icon_note.png
524 ms
footer_bg.png
695 ms
g_brd_3.png
526 ms
org_1.png
503 ms
org_2.png
503 ms
org_3.png
530 ms
org_4.png
526 ms
org_5.png
536 ms
org_6.png
529 ms
org_7.png
504 ms
org_8.png
573 ms
org_9.png
551 ms
org_10.png
540 ms
org_11.png
532 ms
org_12.png
535 ms
org_13.png
577 ms
org_14.png
584 ms
org_15.png
546 ms
org_16.png
543 ms
org_17.png
559 ms
org_18.png
529 ms
li_2.png
574 ms
icon_c_1.png
583 ms
icon_c_2.png
518 ms
icon_c_3.png
516 ms
icon_c_4.png
516 ms
slide_on.png
541 ms
slide_off.png
577 ms
prev.png
583 ms
next.png
514 ms
review-btn.html
774 ms
chat_ru_RU.js
404 ms
label-ie8.css
96 ms
chat-ie8.css
190 ms
main.css
477 ms
style_88x31.css
121 ms
btn88x31.png
150 ms
hostlife.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
hostlife.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
hostlife.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hostlife.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Hostlife.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hostlife.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of HOSTLIFE. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: