2.1 sec in total
679 ms
1.3 sec
130 ms
Click here to check amazing Hotels Comparison content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about hotelscomparison.com
Voted the number one Hotels Comparison website. Compare the cheapest hotel rates
Visit hotelscomparison.comWe analyzed Hotelscomparison.com page load time and found that the first response time was 679 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
hotelscomparison.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.5 s
95/100
10%
Value1.5 s
100/100
25%
Value1.9 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.31
38/100
15%
Value1.5 s
100/100
10%
679 ms
278 ms
279 ms
280 ms
284 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Hotelscomparison.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (679 ms) belongs to the original domain Hotelscomparison.com.
Page size can be reduced by 114.9 kB (86%)
133.1 kB
18.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Hotelscomparison.com main page is 133.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 96.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 23.3 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.5 kB or 91% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hotels Comparison images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 17.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 17.5 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hotelscomparison.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.0 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (57%)
46
20
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hotels Comparison. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
hotelscomparison.com
679 ms
calendar5.css
278 ms
hotelscomparison5.css
279 ms
hotelscomparison6.js
280 ms
simplecalendar6.js
284 ms
hc_addtofavourites5.js
281 ms
hc_hovertext5.js
282 ms
up.gif
118 ms
down.gif
201 ms
hotelscomparison.gif
103 ms
spacer.gif
102 ms
menuon.gif
104 ms
menudivider.gif
105 ms
menubanner.gif
105 ms
pagetitle_search.gif
104 ms
thesundaytimes.gif
203 ms
box_topleft.gif
202 ms
box_topright.gif
209 ms
question.gif
205 ms
calendar.gif
205 ms
box_botleft.gif
206 ms
box_botright.gif
300 ms
alpharooms.gif
302 ms
intercontinental.gif
305 ms
atlasdirect.gif
306 ms
laterooms.gif
307 ms
bookings.gif
312 ms
hotelsdotcom.gif
400 ms
crowne.gif
402 ms
quickrooms.gif
409 ms
expedia.gif
409 ms
ratestogo.gif
409 ms
hotelopia.gif
416 ms
travelocity.gif
501 ms
travelbag.jpg
503 ms
superbreak.gif
511 ms
holidayinn.gif
511 ms
lastminute.gif
512 ms
hotelclub.gif
519 ms
thomascook.gif
600 ms
ebookers.gif
604 ms
venere.gif
622 ms
menubottomdivider.gif
611 ms
box_bgtop.gif
580 ms
box_bgleft.gif
580 ms
box_bgright.gif
608 ms
box_bgbottom.gif
611 ms
hotelscomparison.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
hotelscomparison.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
hotelscomparison.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hotelscomparison.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Hotelscomparison.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
hotelscomparison.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hotels Comparison. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: