Tools & Wizards About Us
hotelterramar.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

hotelterramar.com

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

688 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

259 ms

hotelterramar.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Hotelterramar content for Spain. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about hotelterramar.com

Visit hotelterramar.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Hotelterramar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 688 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hotelterramar.com performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

51/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

78/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value820 ms

35/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.6 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hotelterramar.com

688 ms

language-selector.css

18 ms

css3panels.css

30 ms

demo3.css

32 ms

icarousel.css

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Hotelterramar.com, 16% (12 requests) were made to Web-terramar.web-reservations.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Hotel-terramar-sitges.web-reservations.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (688 ms) belongs to the original domain Hotelterramar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (16%)

Content Size

6.2 MB

After Optimization

5.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Hotelterramar.com main page is 6.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 35.7 kB

  • Original 45.0 kB
  • After minification 43.6 kB
  • After compression 9.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 31.2 kB

  • Original 4.9 MB
  • After minification 4.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hotelterramar images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 503.9 kB

  • Original 751.8 kB
  • After minification 725.7 kB
  • After compression 247.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 503.9 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 443.1 kB

  • Original 521.8 kB
  • After minification 443.1 kB
  • After compression 78.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hotelterramar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 443.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (61%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hotelterramar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

hotelterramar.com

hotelterramar.com

688 ms

language-selector.css

language-selector.css

18 ms

css3panels.css

css3panels.css

30 ms

demo3.css

demo3.css

32 ms

icarousel.css

icarousel.css

31 ms

shadows.css

shadows.css

31 ms

estilos.css

estilos.css

32 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

36 ms

superfish.css

superfish.css

31 ms

template.css

template.css

49 ms

bootstrap-responsive.css

bootstrap-responsive.css

40 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

31 ms

style.css

style.css

32 ms

css

css

67 ms

css

css

68 ms

css

css

68 ms

dark-theme.css

dark-theme.css

41 ms

options.css

options.css

39 ms

style.css

style.css

43 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

55 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

54 ms

principal.js

principal.js

54 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

59 ms

form-new.js

form-new.js

61 ms

styles-730434.css

styles-730434.css

60 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

53 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

52 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

51 ms

superfish_menu.js

superfish_menu.js

51 ms

jquery.iosslider.min.js

jquery.iosslider.min.js

52 ms

jquery.iosslider.kalypso.js

jquery.iosslider.kalypso.js

51 ms

css3panels.js

css3panels.js

52 ms

icarousel.packed.js

icarousel.packed.js

53 ms

jquery.mousewheel.js

jquery.mousewheel.js

51 ms

raphael-min.js

raphael-min.js

54 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

53 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

52 ms

znscript.js

znscript.js

54 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

54 ms

sitepress.js

sitepress.js

53 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

43 ms

widget-searchbox.js

widget-searchbox.js

303 ms

all.js

all.js

12 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

49 ms

glyphicons-halflings-white.png

glyphicons-halflings-white.png

11 ms

Slider2.jpg

Slider2.jpg

50 ms

slider5.jpg

slider5.jpg

47 ms

slider7.jpg

slider7.jpg

52 ms

Slider1.jpg

Slider1.jpg

48 ms

slider4.jpg

slider4.jpg

578 ms

slider6.jpg

slider6.jpg

50 ms

slider41.jpg

slider41.jpg

53 ms

slider.jpg

slider.jpg

55 ms

slider1.jpg

slider1.jpg

52 ms

slider51.jpg

slider51.jpg

53 ms

ok.png

ok.png

51 ms

en.png

en.png

6 ms

es.png

es.png

37 ms

glyphicons-halflings.png

glyphicons-halflings.png

37 ms

loader_dark.gif

loader_dark.gif

37 ms

controls.png

controls.png

37 ms

hotel.jpg

hotel.jpg

38 ms

habitacion.jpg

habitacion.jpg

39 ms

promo.jpg

promo.jpg

41 ms

122 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

36 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

42 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

78 ms

social-icons-sprite.png

social-icons-sprite.png

68 ms

arrow_totop.png

arrow_totop.png

67 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.23.custom.css

jquery-ui-1.8.23.custom.css

57 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

77 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

78 ms

widget_datepicker.js

widget_datepicker.js

76 ms

Accessibility Review

hotelterramar.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

hotelterramar.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

hotelterramar.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    ES

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hotelterramar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Spanish. Our system also found out that Hotelterramar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

hotelterramar.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hotelterramar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: