Tools & Wizards About Us
housekeepinghelp.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 60

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

housekeepinghelp.com

Housekeeping Jobs | Cleaning Jobs | Home Cleaning Services

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

325 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

862 ms

housekeepinghelp.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Housekeeping Help content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about housekeepinghelp.com

Housekeeping Jobs Directory Search for Cleaning Jobs and Home Cleaning Services Needed or Available. Find the Best House cleaners in every state.

Visit housekeepinghelp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Housekeepinghelp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 325 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

housekeepinghelp.com performance score

60

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

59/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

89/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value770 ms

38/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.2 s

25/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

housekeepinghelp.com

325 ms

all.js

18 ms

plusone.js

542 ms

show_ads.js

40 ms

greenbar2.gif

537 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Housekeepinghelp.com, 19% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 14% (6 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (914 ms) relates to the external source Pagead2.googlesyndication.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 88.6 kB (59%)

Content Size

150.1 kB

After Optimization

61.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Housekeepinghelp.com main page is 150.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 109.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 75.5 kB

  • Original 109.1 kB
  • After minification 107.9 kB
  • After compression 33.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.5 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 396 B

  • Original 5.5 kB
  • After minification 5.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Housekeeping Help images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 12.6 kB

  • Original 35.5 kB
  • After minification 35.3 kB
  • After compression 22.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 12.6 kB or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (44%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Housekeeping Help. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

housekeepinghelp.com

housekeepinghelp.com

325 ms

all.js

all.js

18 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

542 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

40 ms

greenbar2.gif

greenbar2.gif

537 ms

secondarypic.gif

secondarypic.gif

556 ms

ca-pub-8641147682096998.js

ca-pub-8641147682096998.js

914 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

492 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

438 ms

605 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

594 ms

ping

ping

652 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

403 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

503 ms

ads

ads

436 ms

expansion_embed.js

expansion_embed.js

89 ms

osd.js

osd.js

75 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

68 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

121 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

191 ms

ads

ads

377 ms

ads

ads

491 ms

ads

ads

431 ms

like.php

like.php

191 ms

btn_subscribeCC_LG.gif

btn_subscribeCC_LG.gif

89 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

50 ms

3193398744-postmessagerelay.js

3193398744-postmessagerelay.js

45 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

40 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

20 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

19 ms

grlryt2bdKIyfMSOhzd1eA.woff

grlryt2bdKIyfMSOhzd1eA.woff

47 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

9 ms

3ioJQls-WvR.js

3ioJQls-WvR.js

35 ms

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

24 ms

abg.js

abg.js

24 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

12 ms

favicon

favicon

57 ms

s

s

31 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

33 ms

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

22 ms

x_button_blue2.svg

x_button_blue2.svg

23 ms

favicon

favicon

30 ms

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

7 ms

Accessibility Review

housekeepinghelp.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

housekeepinghelp.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

housekeepinghelp.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Housekeepinghelp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Housekeepinghelp.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

housekeepinghelp.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Housekeeping Help. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: