4.2 sec in total
231 ms
3.7 sec
230 ms
Visit htmlstaff.org now to see the best up-to-date HTMLStaff content for Brazil and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about htmlstaff.org
A site focused on Technology and Web Development Advice
Visit htmlstaff.orgWe analyzed Htmlstaff.org page load time and found that the first response time was 231 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
htmlstaff.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
24/100
10%
Value7.8 s
3/100
25%
Value32.2 s
0/100
10%
Value590 ms
50/100
30%
Value0.39
26/100
15%
Value60.0 s
0/100
10%
231 ms
1145 ms
262 ms
264 ms
265 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Htmlstaff.org, 14% (9 requests) were made to Adclient.siga.uol.com.br and 8% (5 requests) were made to Hostnet.com.br. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Htmlstaff.org.
Page size can be reduced by 107.1 kB (42%)
253.7 kB
146.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Htmlstaff.org main page is 253.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 111.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, HTMLStaff needs image optimization as it can save up to 16.3 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 31.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 31.2 kB or 50% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Htmlstaff.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (43%)
60
34
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of HTMLStaff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
htmlstaff.org
231 ms
www.htmlstaff.org
1145 ms
components.css
262 ms
skeleton_default.css
264 ms
jquery.js
265 ms
barra.php
405 ms
uolaf.js
420 ms
urchin.js
21 ms
btn_donateCC_LG.gif
41 ms
pixel.gif
42 ms
logo.gif
277 ms
iconBrasil.gif
266 ms
42.gif
260 ms
48.gif
266 ms
iconLinkApache.gif
275 ms
iconLinkPhp.gif
261 ms
iconLinkMysql.gif
523 ms
iconLinkCc.gif
519 ms
iconLinkSpamPoison.gif
523 ms
iconLinkRss.gif
525 ms
iconLinkAtom.gif
534 ms
iconTwitter.gif
535 ms
112273206.jpg
793 ms
7116118.jpg
910 ms
6697771.jpg
785 ms
hostnet.gif
801 ms
imd.gif
789 ms
all.js
50 ms
bg.gif
1433 ms
pageBg.gif
2055 ms
167 ms
xd_arbiter.php
53 ms
xd_arbiter.php
89 ms
style.css
16 ms
ok.gif
868 ms
inputBg.gif
899 ms
headerBg.gif
899 ms
bg.jpg
13 ms
barra_logo.jpg
175 ms
format2.html
674 ms
area1Bg.gif
892 ms
format2.html
1088 ms
headerNewsbg.gif
989 ms
format2.html
1078 ms
area3Bg.gif
1119 ms
arrowWhite.gif
1107 ms
area2Bg.gif
1110 ms
format5_c.html
921 ms
footerBg.gif
1213 ms
__utm.gif
20 ms
like.php
88 ms
L70CG02Crze.js
59 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
60 ms
blp.css
269 ms
gen.js
272 ms
fb.js
399 ms
uolsigainit.min.js
406 ms
uolsigaretarget.min.js
408 ms
653cbc0f642043a2a0bf6048e9555818.jpeg
407 ms
c4214f0ec699416b9e0f9857ee83347b.jpeg
521 ms
f8489c32f90142c68df37c1c1301a6b8.jpeg
653 ms
8d6e57ad4a984ba29f8e2433315bcb2f.jpeg
649 ms
20c58c4c976c4352b2a90febe8903dfa.jpeg
645 ms
htmlstaff.org accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
htmlstaff.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
htmlstaff.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
PT
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Htmlstaff.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Portuguese language. Our system also found out that Htmlstaff.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
htmlstaff.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of HTMLStaff. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: