1.5 sec in total
47 ms
1 sec
437 ms
Visit hurstreview.com now to see the best up-to-date Hurst Review content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hurstreview.com
Visit hurstreview.comWe analyzed Hurstreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 47 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
hurstreview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value5.9 s
14/100
25%
Value9.4 s
12/100
10%
Value4,510 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.045
99/100
15%
Value18.4 s
4/100
10%
47 ms
95 ms
107 ms
119 ms
127 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Hurstreview.com, 19% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 13% (9 requests) were made to S3.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (258 ms) relates to the external source S3.amazonaws.com.
Page size can be reduced by 547.8 kB (39%)
1.4 MB
867.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Hurstreview.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 771.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.8 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 86.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Hurst Review needs image optimization as it can save up to 86.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 203.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 203.6 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 226.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hurstreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 226.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (53%)
49
23
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hurst Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
home
47 ms
css
95 ms
css
107 ms
css
119 ms
css
127 ms
normalize.css
11 ms
foundation.min.css
55 ms
font-awesome.min.css
67 ms
flag-icon.min.css
35 ms
custom.css
32 ms
menu.css
44 ms
style.css
48 ms
modernizr.js
50 ms
seal.js
233 ms
jquery.js
67 ms
foundation.min.js
72 ms
foundation.topbar.js
70 ms
foundation.reveal.js
65 ms
foundation.tooltip.js
64 ms
foundation.offcanvas.js
70 ms
app.js
69 ms
conversion.js
69 ms
seal.min.js
218 ms
loader.js
226 ms
fbevents.js
221 ms
logo.png
27 ms
list-bullet.png
213 ms
header-bg.jpg
258 ms
RN%20Super.jpg
246 ms
Nurse%20Image%2016.jpg
242 ms
hurst-hints.jpeg
245 ms
fb.png
210 ms
twt.png
245 ms
yt.png
227 ms
side-flag-sm.jpg
244 ms
us.svg
63 ms
ca.svg
50 ms
guaranteed.png
65 ms
emoji.png
62 ms
testi_hr_icon.png
65 ms
article1.jpg
201 ms
article2.jpg
202 ms
article3.jpg
202 ms
seal_image.php
159 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
71 ms
KT3KS9Aol4WfR6Vas8kNcg.woff
89 ms
boeCNmOCCh-EWFLSfVffDg.woff
156 ms
wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff
164 ms
BVtM30trf7q_jfqYeHfjtA.woff
209 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
18 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
185 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcgFhaRv2pGgT5Kf0An0s4MM.woff
185 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlBM0YzuT7MdOe03otPbuUS0.woff
209 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGNbE_oMaV8t2eFeISPpzbdE.woff
186 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGMa9awK0IKUjIWABZIchFI8.woff
208 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGJ6-ys_j0H4QL65VLqzI3wI.woff
207 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGFkQc6VGVFSmCnC_l7QZG60.woff
208 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGHiec-hVyr2k4iOzEQsW1iE.woff
207 ms
ga.js
76 ms
194 ms
impl-1_22.js
18 ms
wcm
21 ms
__utm.gif
59 ms
79 ms
bat.js
98 ms
46 ms
42 ms
hurstreview.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
hurstreview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
hurstreview.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hurstreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Hurstreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hurstreview.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hurst Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: