8.3 sec in total
674 ms
7.3 sec
309 ms
Click here to check amazing Hydrocare content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about hydrocare.com.my
Hydrocare Engineering Sdn Bhd is a representative and distributor of a broad range of quality fluid handling equipment that are manufactured by world-class manufacturers
Visit hydrocare.com.myWe analyzed Hydrocare.com.my page load time and found that the first response time was 674 ms and then it took 7.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
hydrocare.com.my performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.0 s
0/100
10%
Value14.5 s
0/100
25%
Value18.3 s
0/100
10%
Value1,150 ms
22/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value18.5 s
3/100
10%
674 ms
14 ms
26 ms
268 ms
543 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Hydrocare.com.my, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Hydrocare.com.my.
Page size can be reduced by 55.4 kB (6%)
875.6 kB
820.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Hydrocare.com.my main page is 875.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 732.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by -8 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This web page is already compressed.
Potential reduce by 28.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hydrocare images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 7.7 kB or 24% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hydrocare.com.my needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.5 kB or 18% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (46%)
74
40
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hydrocare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
674 ms
css
14 ms
css
26 ms
font-awesome.css
268 ms
z-nav.css
543 ms
component.css
508 ms
magnific-popup.css
581 ms
tabs.css
603 ms
tabstyles.css
611 ms
jquery_1.11.1.min.js
762 ms
bootstrap.min.js
753 ms
component.css
790 ms
content.css
817 ms
blueimp-gallery.css
844 ms
style.css
856 ms
touch.css
1046 ms
modernizr.custom.js
1064 ms
panzoom.js
1039 ms
osp.css
1068 ms
osp.css
1081 ms
osp.css
1091 ms
osp.css
1276 ms
responsiveslides.css
1282 ms
osp_82005.css
1299 ms
responsiveslides.js
1318 ms
osp.css
1327 ms
TweenLite.min.js
1536 ms
EasePack.min.js
1541 ms
rAF.js
1559 ms
header-animate.js
1553 ms
animation-bubble.js
1568 ms
animation-bubble-fixed.js
1578 ms
waypoints.min.js
1788 ms
jquery.mobile.menu.js
1807 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
1847 ms
SmoothScroll.js
1832 ms
cbpFWTabs.js
1852 ms
count.down.js
1869 ms
jquery.blueberry.js
1777 ms
form.js
1590 ms
custom.js
1574 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
1520 ms
classie.js
1496 ms
uiMorphingButton_fixed.js
1504 ms
config.js
1536 ms
jquery.blueimp-gallery.min.js
1573 ms
general.js
1576 ms
bootstrap.cus.css
1771 ms
style-sitebuilder.css
1806 ms
style_accordion.css
1543 ms
style_form.css
1487 ms
style_osp.css
1558 ms
tabs.css
240 ms
tabstyles.css
240 ms
css
34 ms
company-logo.png
277 ms
39923756_m.jpg
535 ms
pulsafeeder_green.png
753 ms
pulsafeeder_blue.png
281 ms
blacoh_logo_e.png
521 ms
longtech_logo.png
509 ms
diffused_logo.png
528 ms
europelec.jpg
530 ms
victor_logo.png
753 ms
Mapro_logo_137x137.png
764 ms
wilo_logo.png
768 ms
grifco.jpg
1003 ms
obl_logo.png
775 ms
Turbowin.png
1247 ms
assoma_logo.png
1020 ms
morph-close.svg
1027 ms
banner_09banner_28final_2020_1600x380_.jpg
2192 ms
frutigernextltboldcond.woff
984 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
23 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
23 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
23 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
24 ms
section-bg.jpg
2647 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1473 ms
touch.css
1197 ms
touch.css
256 ms
hydrocare.com.my accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
hydrocare.com.my best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
hydrocare.com.my SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hydrocare.com.my can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Hydrocare.com.my main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hydrocare.com.my
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hydrocare. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: