4 sec in total
322 ms
3 sec
665 ms
Visit hyfpack.com now to see the best up-to-date HYF Pack content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hyfpack.com
Over 10 years' production experience, we supply shrink packaging material. We have a whole set of shrink film packaging quality management system. Contact us now.
Visit hyfpack.comWe analyzed Hyfpack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 322 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
hyfpack.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value12.2 s
0/100
25%
Value6.6 s
38/100
10%
Value240 ms
85/100
30%
Value0.363
30/100
15%
Value6.7 s
56/100
10%
322 ms
420 ms
36 ms
81 ms
118 ms
Our browser made a total of 113 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (106 requests) were addressed to the original Hyfpack.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (933 ms) belongs to the original domain Hyfpack.com.
Page size can be reduced by 77.9 kB (5%)
1.5 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Hyfpack.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 55.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.4 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. HYF Pack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hyfpack.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (44%)
108
60
The browser has sent 108 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of HYF Pack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
hyfpack.com
322 ms
www.hyfpack.com
420 ms
fonts.css
36 ms
style.css
81 ms
animate.min.css
118 ms
nav.css
151 ms
slide5.css
186 ms
jquery.jqzoom.css
220 ms
baguetteBox.css
254 ms
jquery-1.11.3.min.js
302 ms
jquery.SuperSlide.2.1.3.js
338 ms
placeholder.js
372 ms
baguetteBox.js
407 ms
jquery.jqzoom.js
443 ms
lunbo.js
477 ms
js
54 ms
js
130 ms
slide5.js
539 ms
slide5_1.js
601 ms
jquery.lazyload.min.js
641 ms
base.js
665 ms
nav.js
696 ms
prod-more.js
709 ms
resize.js
744 ms
wow.min.js
778 ms
form.js
813 ms
gtm.js
63 ms
facebook.png
365 ms
twitter.png
400 ms
linkedin.png
431 ms
pinterest.png
465 ms
google.png
464 ms
youtube.png
497 ms
search.png
498 ms
logo.png
526 ms
logo1.png
532 ms
banner-bg.png
557 ms
5c73694c27656_.webp
673 ms
5c7735829856d_.webp
685 ms
5c807943d96aa_.webp
740 ms
web6.png
715 ms
web7.png
746 ms
web8.png
774 ms
web9.png
776 ms
5c74dd95987ad.png
809 ms
5c78f7cfe7801.png
808 ms
5c78f7e3cfda8.png
839 ms
5c738eb37a34d.png
843 ms
5c738ec035894.png
871 ms
5c738eca264b4.png
877 ms
5c738ed15062f.png
902 ms
5c78f7fd2669d.png
912 ms
5c78f806db3e7.png
933 ms
5c78f814570f8.png
900 ms
5c78f81ce1932.png
916 ms
analytics.js
117 ms
destination
87 ms
Gotham-Bold.woff
865 ms
OpenSans.woff
875 ms
OpenSans-Bold.woff
882 ms
collect
13 ms
5c78f829bcb2d.png
846 ms
collect
48 ms
5c78f83248340.png
868 ms
5c78f839d0e56.png
837 ms
5c78f8424acb1.png
829 ms
65e96e51d1530.jpg
791 ms
65dc347d17bf9.jpg
908 ms
65d1a449498ee.jpg
754 ms
5c626b9a83526_.webp
762 ms
5c7356a451657_.webp
794 ms
5c626bac654c4_.webp
796 ms
5c626c27f03b0_.webp
827 ms
5c73574f848fc_.webp
815 ms
5c626c20c102c_.webp
829 ms
5c626c3cae5ba_.webp
817 ms
5c626c4c478c5_.webp
724 ms
5c626c77220f7_.webp
721 ms
5c626c70b3b91_.webp
719 ms
5c626c89647a4_.webp
698 ms
5c7357698966a_.webp
720 ms
5c626c91dc782_.webp
698 ms
5c6f911c5a4fd_.webp
720 ms
5c7347d63071f_.webp
695 ms
5c626cc107bfa_.webp
774 ms
5c75df469fb6e_.webp
695 ms
5c75e057c6351_.webp
690 ms
5c626d094165d_.webp
666 ms
common-reanod.png
688 ms
wechat.png
664 ms
wx.png
657 ms
whatsapp.png
662 ms
skype.png
652 ms
email.png
637 ms
dot.png
594 ms
bg.png
608 ms
web1.png
573 ms
dot1.png
567 ms
web2.png
558 ms
web3.png
570 ms
web4.png
544 ms
web5.png
522 ms
btn1.png
497 ms
btn2.png
471 ms
btn3.png
441 ms
btn4.png
414 ms
web10.png
419 ms
common-date.png
404 ms
web11.png
388 ms
web12.png
375 ms
f-bg.jpg
417 ms
web13.png
362 ms
back-top.png
355 ms
hyfpack.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
hyfpack.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
hyfpack.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hyfpack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hyfpack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hyfpack.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of HYF Pack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: