2.6 sec in total
149 ms
1.4 sec
1.1 sec
Visit 2014.isdef.org now to see the best up-to-date 2014 ISDEF content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about 2014.isdef.org
14-я конференция ISDEF: 2 дня о том, как сделать твой IT-бизнес глобальным
Visit 2014.isdef.orgWe analyzed 2014.isdef.org page load time and found that the first response time was 149 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
2014.isdef.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value25.3 s
0/100
25%
Value12.7 s
3/100
10%
Value710 ms
42/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value22.7 s
1/100
10%
149 ms
164 ms
252 ms
112 ms
72 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original 2014.isdef.org, 5% (4 requests) were made to Api-maps.yandex.ru and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (552 ms) relates to the external source Api-maps.yandex.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (32%)
4.7 MB
3.2 MB
In fact, the total size of 2014.isdef.org main page is 4.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 79.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 25.5 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 990.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, 2014 ISDEF needs image optimization as it can save up to 990.9 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 273.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 273.2 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 156.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 2014.isdef.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 156.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (16%)
70
59
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 2014 ISDEF. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
2014.isdef.org
149 ms
jquery-1.11.1.min.js
164 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
252 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
112 ms
jquery.youtubepopup.min.js
72 ms
reset.css
54 ms
bootstrap.min.css
142 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
147 ms
style.min.css
154 ms
250 ms
forms.js
142 ms
css
24 ms
logo2.png
89 ms
sp1.png
88 ms
sp4.png
89 ms
sp5.png
94 ms
sp2.png
89 ms
sp3.png
99 ms
you.png
92 ms
552 ms
s.png
66 ms
bg.png
205 ms
photo.jpg
124 ms
button-ok.png
76 ms
list-marker.jpg
75 ms
icon-owner.png
83 ms
icon-startup.png
122 ms
icon-manager.png
121 ms
icon-dollar.png
121 ms
icon-developer.png
122 ms
icon-folder.png
152 ms
bg2.jpg
156 ms
v1.jpg
152 ms
v2.jpg
152 ms
v3.jpg
152 ms
v4.jpg
158 ms
v5.jpg
163 ms
v6.jpg
159 ms
v11.png
182 ms
v12.png
181 ms
v13.png
207 ms
v14.png
208 ms
v15.png
232 ms
v16.png
230 ms
v17.png
258 ms
v18.png
228 ms
v19.png
258 ms
v20.png
256 ms
v21.png
258 ms
v22.png
231 ms
v23.png
220 ms
avangate.png
233 ms
mycommerce.png
231 ms
itmozg.png
229 ms
apptractor.png
236 ms
RjgO7rYTmqiVp7vzi-Q5UaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
16 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTfOEPOIfcPv-fZ-WyMUtx48.ttf
52 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSvOEPOIfcPv-fZ-WyMUtx48.ttf
17 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzPOEPOIfcPv-fZ-WyMUtx48.ttf
17 ms
ictonline.png
241 ms
apps4all.png
241 ms
softweek.png
247 ms
valuehostpro.png
236 ms
saas.png
245 ms
play.png
205 ms
112 ms
s2.png
53 ms
time-scale.png
52 ms
bg.jpg
42 ms
footer-list-marker.png
41 ms
footer-list-ok-icon.png
40 ms
analytics.js
23 ms
get-contact-form.php
51 ms
ui-bg_highlight-soft_100_eeeeee_1x100.png
26 ms
collect
16 ms
ajax-loader.gif
26 ms
280 ms
2014.isdef.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
No form fields have multiple labels
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
2014.isdef.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
2014.isdef.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 2014.isdef.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that 2014.isdef.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
2014.isdef.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 2014 ISDEF. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: