Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 75% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

amsterdam.intercontinental.com

Official Website of Amstel Hotel | Luxury 5 Star - Amstel Hotel Amsterdam

Page Load Speed

6.1 sec in total

First Response

807 ms

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

941 ms

amsterdam.intercontinental.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to amsterdam.intercontinental.com homepage info - get ready to check Amsterdam Intercontinental best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about amsterdam.intercontinental.com

Celebrate the one-off craftmanship, the unique folklore and the 150 years of royalty-approved service that makes this hotel irreplaceable: a true one off.

Visit amsterdam.intercontinental.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Amsterdam.intercontinental.com page load time and found that the first response time was 807 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Amsterdam.intercontinental.com rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

amsterdam.intercontinental.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

39/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,470 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.021

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.9 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

807 ms

widgetkit-b0b78c77.css

170 ms

jcemediabox.css

175 ms

style.css

176 ms

settings.css

178 ms

Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Amsterdam.intercontinental.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Code.jquery.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Amsterdam.intercontinental.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.4 MB (15%)

Content Size

15.6 MB

After Optimization

13.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Amsterdam.intercontinental.com main page is 15.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 14.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 88.9 kB

  • Original 104.7 kB
  • After minification 85.3 kB
  • After compression 15.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.3 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 14.2 MB
  • After minification 13.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Amsterdam Intercontinental images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 496.6 kB

  • Original 701.8 kB
  • After minification 693.5 kB
  • After compression 205.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 496.6 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 562.6 kB

  • Original 648.1 kB
  • After minification 492.2 kB
  • After compression 85.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Amsterdam.intercontinental.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 562.6 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (54%)

Requests Now

76

After Optimization

35

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Amsterdam Intercontinental. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

amsterdam.intercontinental.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

amsterdam.intercontinental.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

amsterdam.intercontinental.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Amsterdam.intercontinental.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Dutch language. Our system also found out that Amsterdam.intercontinental.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Amsterdam Intercontinental. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: