12.1 sec in total
5.6 sec
6.4 sec
134 ms
Visit arrowfield.isystems.com now to see the best up-to-date Arrowfield Isystems content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about arrowfield.isystems.com
Visit arrowfield.isystems.comWe analyzed Arrowfield.isystems.com page load time and found that the first response time was 5.6 sec and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
arrowfield.isystems.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
Value0.6 s
100/100
25%
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
5588 ms
79 ms
165 ms
85 ms
67 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Arrowfield.isystems.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Arrowfield.isystems.com.
Page size can be reduced by 879.9 kB (72%)
1.2 MB
345.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Arrowfield.isystems.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 875.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 71.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Arrowfield Isystems needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.9 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 607.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 607.7 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 196.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Arrowfield.isystems.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 196.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (63%)
35
13
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Arrowfield Isystems. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
arrowfield.isystems.com
5588 ms
css
79 ms
bootstrap.css
165 ms
Site.css
85 ms
style.css
67 ms
jquery-1.11.1.min.js
201 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.4.min.js
229 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.4.min.css
78 ms
LogError.js
107 ms
smoothDivScroll.css
121 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
131 ms
jquery.kinetic.min.js
144 ms
jquery.smoothdivscroll-1.3-min.js
159 ms
moment-with-locales.min.js
258 ms
jquery.dataTables.min.js
233 ms
three_button.js
167 ms
dataTables.bootstrap.css
197 ms
dataTables.bootstrap.js
199 ms
datepicker3.css
232 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.js
233 ms
Filter.js
249 ms
highcharts.js
350 ms
MiniCharts.js
262 ms
bootstrap.min.js
274 ms
iSystemslogo70_powered_by.png
50 ms
padlock.jpg
33 ms
more_info_icon.png
26 ms
star_white_icon.png
37 ms
graphsymbolwhite.png
50 ms
info_icon.png
62 ms
logo.png
75 ms
steps_isystems_1.png
62 ms
steps_isystems_2.png
63 ms
steps_isystems_3.png
62 ms
steps_isystems_4.png
62 ms
Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsDR-eWpsHSw83BRsAQElGgc.ttf
63 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nL3QFSXBldIn45k5A7iXhnc.ttf
65 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nDokq8qT6AIiNJ07Vf_NrVA.ttf
84 ms
ga.js
46 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
359 ms
arrowfield.isystems.com accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
arrowfield.isystems.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
arrowfield.isystems.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Arrowfield.isystems.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Arrowfield.isystems.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
arrowfield.isystems.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Arrowfield Isystems. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: