7.5 sec in total
1.9 sec
5 sec
567 ms
Welcome to iec.net homepage info - get ready to check IEC best content right away, or after learning these important things about iec.net
All of your connectivity needs in one place! Cables (including custom cables) and Accessories for Computer / Audio / Video / Telephone
Visit iec.netWe analyzed Iec.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
iec.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value12.4 s
0/100
10%
Value25.9 s
0/100
25%
Value18.8 s
0/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.597
11/100
15%
Value22.7 s
1/100
10%
1870 ms
198 ms
463 ms
403 ms
223 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (83 requests) were addressed to the original Iec.net, 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Iec.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (27%)
5.2 MB
3.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Iec.net main page is 5.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 201.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 201.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. IEC images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 383.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 383.0 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 785.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Iec.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 785.5 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (51%)
85
42
The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IEC. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
iec.net
1870 ms
brand-slider.css
198 ms
style.min.css
463 ms
style.min.css
403 ms
wc-blocks-vendors-style.css
223 ms
wc-all-blocks-style.css
541 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
325 ms
woocommerce.css
423 ms
style.css
328 ms
bootstrap.css
516 ms
font-awesome.css
407 ms
jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap.css
477 ms
style.css
487 ms
select2.css
375 ms
RegistrationForm.css
410 ms
front.js
433 ms
md5.js
437 ms
util.js
452 ms
jquery.min.js
462 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
483 ms
bootstrap.js
491 ms
jquery.smartmenus.js
500 ms
jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap.js
514 ms
js
54 ms
counter.js
22 ms
nivo-slider.css
517 ms
public.css
518 ms
default.css
518 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
518 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
519 ms
js.cookie.min.js
519 ms
woocommerce.min.js
520 ms
script.js
520 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
541 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
541 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
541 ms
hooks.min.js
572 ms
i18n.min.js
573 ms
actions.js
562 ms
scripts.min.js
691 ms
common.js
646 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js
573 ms
script.min.js
570 ms
bgimage.jpg
507 ms
fb.png
353 ms
twitter.png
355 ms
pinterest.png
354 ms
google.png
355 ms
youtube.png
383 ms
logo.png
401 ms
CM1-820x336.jpg
400 ms
CM2-820x336.jpg
465 ms
AV1-820x336.jpg
501 ms
AV2-820x336.jpg
497 ms
TV1-820x336.jpg
474 ms
TV2-820x336.jpg
508 ms
VID1-820x336.jpg
549 ms
VID2-820x336.jpg
553 ms
WM2-820x336.jpg
640 ms
WM1-820x336.jpg
567 ms
rotatorcable.png
601 ms
EP100054C.png
580 ms
M52551.png
552 ms
ADP5104.png
663 ms
SEB2043.png
696 ms
WDH661344.png
722 ms
ADP3168A.png
667 ms
count
132 ms
js
48 ms
analytics.js
43 ms
modules.woff
657 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
735 ms
LSD56-015.png
734 ms
H0005.png
725 ms
M9193R.png
737 ms
K3100037.png
747 ms
M2418-___.png
814 ms
collect
16 ms
M2414-___.png
727 ms
M5133B-PL-___.png
748 ms
ADP5136.png
732 ms
ACC70700.png
626 ms
M51544-06.png
716 ms
logo-footer.png
708 ms
cable-footer.png
710 ms
creditcards.png
702 ms
arrows.png
701 ms
bullets.png
735 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
79 ms
iec.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
iec.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
iec.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Iec.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Iec.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
iec.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of IEC. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: