Tools & Wizards About Us
ieg.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 90

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

ieg.net

Electrolysis and Skincare at the Image Enrichment Group, Cupertino

Page Load Speed

645 ms in total

First Response

208 ms

Resources Loaded

304 ms

Page Rendered

133 ms

ieg.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ieg.net homepage info - get ready to check Ieg best content right away, or after learning these important things about ieg.net

Image Enrichment Group - Because you deserve it! Microdermabrasion, Electrolysis, Permanent hair removal, more, Serving the Bay Area. Cupertino, San Jose, Los Altos, Saratoga, Santa Clara, 95002, 9500...

Visit ieg.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Ieg.net page load time and found that the first response time was 208 ms and then it took 437 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ieg.net performance score

90

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

84/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

86/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.1 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.3 s

61/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ieg.net

208 ms

styles.css

20 ms

index_header.jpg

62 ms

spacer.gif

38 ms

Index_home.gif

35 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Ieg.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (208 ms) belongs to the original domain Ieg.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 14.4 kB (30%)

Content Size

47.7 kB

After Optimization

33.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ieg.net main page is 47.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 36.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 6.1 kB

  • Original 8.1 kB
  • After minification 7.4 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.1 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 6.3 kB

  • Original 36.9 kB
  • After minification 30.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ieg needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.3 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 2.6 kB
  • After minification 2.2 kB
  • After compression 616 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ieg.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.0 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ieg. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

ieg.net

ieg.net

208 ms

styles.css

styles.css

20 ms

index_header.jpg

index_header.jpg

62 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

38 ms

Index_home.gif

Index_home.gif

35 ms

index_services.gif

index_services.gif

37 ms

index_products.gif

index_products.gif

37 ms

index_gift_cards.gif

index_gift_cards.gif

37 ms

index_about_us.gif

index_about_us.gif

53 ms

index_directions.gif

index_directions.gif

53 ms

index_contact_us.gif

index_contact_us.gif

54 ms

index_resources.gif

index_resources.gif

54 ms

index_sitemap.gif

index_sitemap.gif

54 ms

index_menu_filler1.gif

index_menu_filler1.gif

72 ms

index_menu_filler2.gif

index_menu_filler2.gif

72 ms

main.gif

main.gif

73 ms

letter_shadow.gif

letter_shadow.gif

72 ms

FShare.jpg

FShare.jpg

82 ms

testimonial.gif

testimonial.gif

62 ms

Accessibility Review

ieg.net accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ieg.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ieg.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ieg.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ieg.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

ieg.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ieg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: