4 sec in total
280 ms
3.4 sec
308 ms
Welcome to igip.com homepage info - get ready to check IGIP best content right away, or after learning these important things about igip.com
Consulting and Engineering Services Worldwide
Visit igip.comWe analyzed Igip.com page load time and found that the first response time was 280 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
igip.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.9 s
0/100
10%
Value9.2 s
1/100
25%
Value8.6 s
17/100
10%
Value150 ms
94/100
30%
Value0.183
66/100
15%
Value8.4 s
38/100
10%
280 ms
615 ms
22 ms
180 ms
182 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Igip.com, 77% (69 requests) were made to Igip.eu and 8% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (913 ms) relates to the external source Igip.eu.
Page size can be reduced by 637.3 kB (21%)
3.1 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Igip.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.9 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. IGIP images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 396.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 396.8 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 164.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Igip.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 164.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (44%)
80
45
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IGIP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
igip.com
280 ms
615 ms
jquery-ui.css
22 ms
jcemediabox.css
180 ms
style.css
182 ms
style.css
185 ms
template.css
186 ms
jquery.min.js
38 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
9 ms
jquerynoconflict.js
181 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
49 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
226 ms
TweenMax.min.js
12 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
748 ms
bootstrap.min.js
755 ms
holder.js
753 ms
app.js
665 ms
jcemediabox.js
356 ms
mootools-core.js
532 ms
core.js
268 ms
mootools-more.js
727 ms
powertools-1.2.0.js
270 ms
slider.js
271 ms
css
24 ms
css
37 ms
system.css
355 ms
general.css
361 ms
bootstrap.min.css
635 ms
composite.css
445 ms
sector-themes.css
533 ms
system.css
93 ms
analytics.js
125 ms
bg-top-navbar.gif
109 ms
flag-gb.jpg
108 ms
logo-BIHSEmini.png
107 ms
logo-igip.png
110 ms
loader.gif
110 ms
keyvisual-WS3-lg.jpg
538 ms
icn-WS-neg.png
181 ms
keyvisual-SW-lg.jpg
367 ms
icn-SW-neg.png
185 ms
keyvisual-CD-lg.jpg
825 ms
icn-CD-neg.png
185 ms
keyvisual-DA-lg.jpg
629 ms
icn-DA-neg.png
277 ms
keyvisual-PH-lg.jpg
552 ms
icn-PH-neg.png
369 ms
keyvisual-START-lg.jpg
551 ms
curve-lg.png
462 ms
img-startseite-services.png
554 ms
icn-readmore.gif
626 ms
img-startseite-careers.png
642 ms
img-startseite-projects.png
644 ms
section-top.png
646 ms
icn-WS-big.png
716 ms
icn-WS-medium.png
716 ms
icn-readmore-neg.gif
734 ms
icn-SW-big.png
735 ms
icn-SW-medium.png
737 ms
icn-CD-big.png
804 ms
icn-CD-medium.png
805 ms
icn-DA-big.png
824 ms
icn-DA-medium.png
825 ms
icn-TC-big.png
828 ms
icn-TC-medium.png
893 ms
icn-AR-big.png
894 ms
icn-AR-medium.png
913 ms
popup.html
820 ms
tooltip.html
819 ms
icn-PH-big.png
820 ms
icn-PH-medium.png
881 ms
bg-footer-top.gif
882 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
17 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
16 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
16 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
17 ms
QQt14e8dY39u-eYBZmppwTqR_3kx9_hJXbbyU8S6IN0.woff
16 ms
cj2hUnSRBhwmSPr9kS5899kZXW4sYc4BjuAIFc1SXII.woff
16 ms
c92rD_x0V1LslSFt3-QEpgRV2F9RPTaqyJ4QibDfkzM.woff
17 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
900 ms
collect
24 ms
logo-bihse.png
840 ms
icn-WS.png
836 ms
icn-SW.png
836 ms
icn-CD.png
808 ms
icn-DA.png
718 ms
icn-PH.png
732 ms
icn-AR.png
643 ms
icn-TC.png
570 ms
separator-footer.gif
557 ms
igip.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
igip.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
igip.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Igip.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Igip.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
igip.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of IGIP. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: