6.6 sec in total
1.4 sec
4.8 sec
441 ms
Visit igrafica.it now to see the best up-to-date I Grafica content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about igrafica.it
Igrafica è un'agenzia web specializzata nella realizzazione siti web, ecommerce e marketing digitale che opera tra Napoli e Salerno.
Visit igrafica.itWe analyzed Igrafica.it page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
igrafica.it performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
65/100
10%
Value3.4 s
68/100
25%
Value5.9 s
47/100
10%
Value960 ms
29/100
30%
Value0.013
100/100
15%
Value14.2 s
9/100
10%
1364 ms
548 ms
359 ms
513 ms
26 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Igrafica.it, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Igrafica.it.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (55%)
2.2 MB
977.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Igrafica.it main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 987.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. I Grafica images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 716.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 716.3 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 437.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Igrafica.it needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 437.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (74%)
72
19
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of I Grafica. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
igrafica.it
1364 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
548 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
359 ms
layerslider.css
513 ms
css
26 ms
styles.css
254 ms
tp_twitter_plugin.css
284 ms
settings.css
564 ms
style.css
370 ms
base.css
504 ms
buttons.css
466 ms
mfn-icons.css
821 ms
grid.css
577 ms
layout.css
1163 ms
shortcodes.css
1058 ms
variables.css
660 ms
style-simple.css
674 ms
animations.min.css
1086 ms
colorpicker.css
830 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
849 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.css
969 ms
prettyPhoto.css
1052 ms
responsive-1240.css
964 ms
responsive.css
1291 ms
style-colors.php
1593 ms
style.php
2686 ms
css
24 ms
css
22 ms
custom.css
1168 ms
style.css
1193 ms
greensock.js
1888 ms
jquery.js
1927 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1668 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
1889 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
1814 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
2249 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
2332 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1836 ms
scripts.js
1837 ms
core.min.js
1864 ms
widget.min.js
1924 ms
mouse.min.js
1882 ms
sortable.min.js
1823 ms
tabs.min.js
1906 ms
accordion.min.js
1822 ms
jquery.plugins.js
2121 ms
animations.min.js
1882 ms
jquery.jplayer.min.js
1978 ms
colorpicker.js
2044 ms
mfn.menu.js
2092 ms
scripts.js
2148 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1974 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1985 ms
jquery.validationEngine-it.js
1978 ms
jquery.validationEngine.js
2090 ms
front-subscribers.js
1841 ms
logo.png
287 ms
home_interactive_offerbox_icon.png
285 ms
home_interactive_offerbox_sep.png
285 ms
home_interactive_slider.jpg
530 ms
home_interactive_slider2.jpg
360 ms
home_interactive_iconbox_1.png
285 ms
home_interactive_iconbox_2.png
312 ms
home_interactive_iconbox_3.png
313 ms
home_interactive_about_pic.jpg
437 ms
home_interactive_portfolio1.jpg
838 ms
home_interactive_portfolio3.jpg
567 ms
home_interactive_portfolio4.jpg
803 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
73 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
74 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
73 ms
RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
74 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
73 ms
mfn-icons.woff
435 ms
IIm-lPOtfVKQy0GMiczF_6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
72 ms
loader.gif
304 ms
tp-leftarrow.png
356 ms
tp-rightarrow.png
368 ms
box_shadow.png
416 ms
igrafica.it accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
igrafica.it best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
igrafica.it SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
IT
IT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Igrafica.it can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Igrafica.it main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
igrafica.it
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of I Grafica. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: