6.3 sec in total
1.6 sec
4.1 sec
573 ms
Welcome to ilove-web.com homepage info - get ready to check I Love Web best content right away, or after learning these important things about ilove-web.com
Blog sur le e-commerce et les médias sociaux de Laurent Evain consultant e-commerce
Visit ilove-web.comWe analyzed Ilove-web.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
ilove-web.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
24/100
10%
Value6.7 s
8/100
25%
Value6.1 s
44/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.0 s
65/100
10%
1562 ms
253 ms
223 ms
176 ms
189 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Ilove-web.com, 13% (13 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 11% (11 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Ilove-web.com.
Page size can be reduced by 735.7 kB (54%)
1.4 MB
623.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Ilove-web.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 488.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 116.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 116.2 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. I Love Web images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 342.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 342.2 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 272.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ilove-web.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 272.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (63%)
96
36
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of I Love Web. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.ilove-web.com
1562 ms
style.css
253 ms
tfg_style.css
223 ms
button.css
176 ms
styles.css
189 ms
postratings-css.css
175 ms
style.css
294 ms
css
39 ms
prototype.js
355 ms
wp-scriptaculous.js
207 ms
effects.js
327 ms
lightbox.js
279 ms
jquery.min.js
82 ms
button.js
307 ms
swfobject.js
319 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
338 ms
jquery.placeholder.min.js
390 ms
custom.js
404 ms
jquery.lazyload.mini.js
421 ms
functions.js
414 ms
js-mode.js
460 ms
tw-sack.js
448 ms
core.cache.css.php
459 ms
core.cache.js.php
493 ms
widgets.js
151 ms
button.js
271 ms
widgets.js
180 ms
in.js
38 ms
jquery.form.min.js
279 ms
scripts.js
303 ms
postratings-js.js
343 ms
lightbox.css
102 ms
throbber.gif
115 ms
throbberlarge.gif
130 ms
standardicons.png
138 ms
search-white.png
115 ms
logo.jpg
280 ms
socialicons.png
138 ms
time2sup.jpg
398 ms
pub-blog-geophyle-lille.jpg
725 ms
modcloth.jpg
432 ms
moo.jpg
438 ms
moleskin.jpg
398 ms
oxbow.jpg
597 ms
wishlist-boden.jpg
725 ms
vignette-me.jpg
723 ms
like.php
109 ms
like.php
114 ms
search-lightgrey.png
681 ms
plusone.js
232 ms
like.php
215 ms
like.php
230 ms
like.php
213 ms
all.js
38 ms
ga.js
121 ms
count.js
290 ms
fy8tT2klpgR.js
168 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
197 ms
41 ms
xd_arbiter.php
136 ms
xd_arbiter.php
160 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
219 ms
__utm.gif
56 ms
rating_over.gif
496 ms
grey.gif
547 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
42 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
97 ms
fastbutton
131 ms
fastbutton
132 ms
fastbutton
134 ms
fastbutton
131 ms
fastbutton
127 ms
like.php
81 ms
like.php
81 ms
like.php
78 ms
like.php
80 ms
like.php
74 ms
oU6fegDj7Uc
113 ms
fy8tT2klpgR.js
42 ms
postmessageRelay
146 ms
count-data.js
295 ms
www-embed-player-vflRGs1ko.css
346 ms
www-embed-player.js
386 ms
rs=AGLTcCM8ZdaKl2-l8lwpCxIYwT3m27ZVnw
127 ms
share
334 ms
sprite_connect_v14.png
410 ms
share
323 ms
share
305 ms
share
287 ms
share
272 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
309 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
238 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
236 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
230 ms
Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js
33 ms
ad_status.js
36 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
66 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
76 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
31 ms
ilove-web.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ilove-web.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ilove-web.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ilove-web.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Ilove-web.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ilove-web.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of I Love Web. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: