24.6 sec in total
220 ms
22.2 sec
2.2 sec
Welcome to imafoodblog.com homepage info - get ready to check Imafoodblog best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about imafoodblog.com
Visit imafoodblog.comWe analyzed Imafoodblog.com page load time and found that the first response time was 220 ms and then it took 24.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
imafoodblog.com performance score
220 ms
465 ms
254 ms
23 ms
17 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Imafoodblog.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net and 2% (2 requests) were made to Foodblogsearch.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.3 sec) relates to the external source Static.technorati.com.
Page size can be reduced by 145.8 kB (3%)
4.2 MB
4.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Imafoodblog.com main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.0 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Imafoodblog images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 74.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 74.2 kB or 54% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Imafoodblog.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (49%)
74
38
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Imafoodblog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
imafoodblog.com
220 ms
index.php
465 ms
style.css
254 ms
23 ms
quant.js
17 ms
counter.js
22 ms
ads.foodieblogroll.com
34 ms
brand
258 ms
basic.css
3 ms
img.css
6 ms
blog_elements.css
251 ms
forms.css
109 ms
basic_styles.css
4 ms
brand
34 ms
blog_base.css
4 ms
item_base.css
26 ms
sharethis.1ac33bc7d4476110a610f925104446ff.css
5 ms
feed-icon32x32.png
16 ms
bground.JPG
29 ms
cover_thumb.JPG
72 ms
tech-fav-1.png
20334 ms
fbs-button-140.png
237 ms
a8.gif
22 ms
rtr.jpg
23 ms
TWD.png
24 ms
feed-icon-16x16.gif
205 ms
twitter-ani.gif
206 ms
CEIMB.png
26 ms
bbd.jpg
24 ms
powered-by-b2evolution-120t.gif
23 ms
cover2.JPG
201 ms
1A.JPG
200 ms
cover.JPG
204 ms
1A.JPG
203 ms
2A.JPG
321 ms
3A.JPG
318 ms
5A.JPG
318 ms
cover.JPG
324 ms
1A.JPG
334 ms
cover2.JPG
341 ms
cover3.JPG
461 ms
1A.JPG
464 ms
2A.JPG
458 ms
3A.JPG
456 ms
cover.JPG
475 ms
cover.JPG
494 ms
1A.JPG
795 ms
2A.JPG
841 ms
cover_thumb.JPG
194 ms
cover_thumb.JPG
193 ms
pixel;r=139162778;a=p-8aNVQMot_AUdk;fpan=1;fpa=P0-227163499-1460126365538;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1460126365537;tzo=-180;ref=;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.imafoodblog.com%2Findex.php;ogl=
29 ms
t.php
57 ms
a10.jpg
436 ms
a16.gif
455 ms
a18.gif
439 ms
border.gif
437 ms
arrow.gif
453 ms
DACLoader.js
55 ms
cover_thumb.JPG
418 ms
search-fb-button-2.png
137 ms
DAC.js
89 ms
getSegment.php
194 ms
a22.gif
303 ms
user.png
313 ms
date.gif
310 ms
a33.gif
308 ms
a38.gif
346 ms
a36.gif
313 ms
bullet.gif
313 ms
cover_thumb.JPG
315 ms
cover_thumb.JPG
315 ms
t.dhj
24 ms
t.dhj
13 ms
x35248
264 ms
pixel
25 ms
hbpix
28 ms
17 ms
11 ms
xrefid.xgi
23 ms
s-3271.xgi
20 ms
cm
21 ms
pixel
15 ms
pixel
15 ms
2981
44 ms
imafoodblog.com SEO score
EN
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imafoodblog.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Imafoodblog.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
imafoodblog.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Imafoodblog. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: