4.5 sec in total
264 ms
4.1 sec
199 ms
Welcome to imaginarywalls.com homepage info - get ready to check Imaginary Walls best content right away, or after learning these important things about imaginarywalls.com
Visit imaginarywalls.comWe analyzed Imaginarywalls.com page load time and found that the first response time was 264 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
imaginarywalls.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
24/100
10%
Value5.5 s
18/100
25%
Value9.3 s
13/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.198
62/100
15%
Value5.2 s
75/100
10%
264 ms
1688 ms
205 ms
63 ms
296 ms
Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Imaginarywalls.com, 21% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Imaginarywalls.com.
Page size can be reduced by 186.3 kB (56%)
334.7 kB
148.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Imaginarywalls.com main page is 334.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 146.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.1 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 674 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Imaginary Walls images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 99.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 99.9 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 70.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Imaginarywalls.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 70.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (31%)
16
11
The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Imaginary Walls. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
imaginarywalls.com
264 ms
www.imaginarywalls.com
1688 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
205 ms
css
63 ms
genericons.css
296 ms
style.css
306 ms
jquery.js
260 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
262 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
134 ms
functions.js
311 ms
wp-embed.min.js
386 ms
ir
36 ms
dca2bcec15002ae3c58912e5c5c4303e
59 ms
0587095e5658ce73f756be4155207493
52 ms
image6_x_1024x1024-300x225.jpg
1517 ms
Bulletin_of_the_California_Academy_of_Sciences_1884-1886_20447355705-223x300.jpg
252 ms
OriginalPhoto-473038478.305781-300x300.jpg
1439 ms
RFda8w1V0eDZheqfcyQ4ENqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
24 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nqp5NA6AAOjfQM_HmvD0shQ.ttf
35 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6ngvr42gIYPGl20Rgir8ypAU.ttf
44 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
47 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
47 ms
Genericons.svg
1784 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
1 ms
imaginarywalls.com accessibility score
imaginarywalls.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
imaginarywalls.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imaginarywalls.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Imaginarywalls.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
imaginarywalls.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Imaginary Walls. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: