913 ms in total
222 ms
568 ms
123 ms
Visit imrc.org now to see the best up-to-date Imrc content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about imrc.org
Buy a domain and see how a premium domain can be the best investment. Your business starts here. Buy a domain today.
Visit imrc.orgWe analyzed Imrc.org page load time and found that the first response time was 222 ms and then it took 691 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
imrc.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.1 s
0/100
10%
Value9.4 s
0/100
25%
Value8.9 s
15/100
10%
Value3,930 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.155
74/100
15%
Value22.0 s
1/100
10%
222 ms
9 ms
6 ms
6 ms
13 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Imrc.org, 27% (8 requests) were made to Images.smartname.com and 27% (8 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (223 ms) relates to the external source Dp.g.doubleclick.net.
Page size can be reduced by 143.2 kB (54%)
264.1 kB
120.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Imrc.org main page is 264.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 211.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Imrc images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 101.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 101.1 kB or 48% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Imrc.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.2 kB or 72% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (66%)
29
10
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Imrc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
imrc.org
222 ms
FlexLander_CAF.css
9 ms
frontend.js
6 ms
cookies.js
6 ms
jquery-1.6.4.min.js
13 ms
google_afd_CAF.js
9 ms
nmads_caf.js
11 ms
caf.js
43 ms
nm_ga_top.js
10 ms
nm_ga_bottom.js
30 ms
caf.gif
18 ms
ADTECH;cfp=1;rndc=1458483979;alias=imrc.org;loc=100;target=_blank;misc=1458483980196
4 ms
caf.gif
34 ms
domainpark.cgi
192 ms
domainpark.cgi
200 ms
domainpark.cgi
223 ms
domainpark.cgi
154 ms
domainpark.cgi
205 ms
domainpark.cgi
161 ms
ga.js
6 ms
caf.gif
29 ms
caf.gif
30 ms
caf.gif
29 ms
caf.gif
28 ms
caf.gif
31 ms
domainpark.cgi
222 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
__utm.gif
3 ms
__utm.gif
4 ms
chevron-white.png
83 ms
imrc.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
imrc.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
imrc.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imrc.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Imrc.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
imrc.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Imrc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: