2.2 sec in total
19 ms
1.9 sec
253 ms
Visit inapp.com now to see the best up-to-date Inapp content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about inapp.com
The most efficient digital solutions company for your business. Get premium software development services at the most affordable rates. Contact us now.
Visit inapp.comWe analyzed Inapp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 19 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
inapp.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value4.5 s
37/100
25%
Value8.0 s
22/100
10%
Value5,350 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.025
100/100
15%
Value19.9 s
2/100
10%
19 ms
1066 ms
47 ms
18 ms
34 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Inapp.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Inapp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (67%)
1.9 MB
639.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Inapp.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 944.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 69.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 62.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Inapp needs image optimization as it can save up to 62.2 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 400.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 400.2 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 771.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inapp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 771.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (54%)
76
35
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inapp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
inapp.com
19 ms
inapp.com
1066 ms
analytics.js
47 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
18 ms
layerslider.css
34 ms
css
99 ms
styles.css
33 ms
frontend.css
67 ms
css
110 ms
css
121 ms
css
149 ms
main.min.css
151 ms
font-awesome.min.css
62 ms
custom-ecd3e0df93.css
124 ms
media.min.css
65 ms
royalslider.css
67 ms
style.css
73 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.css
73 ms
jquery.min.js
76 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
72 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
104 ms
greensock.js
115 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
76 ms
modernizr.js
78 ms
svg-icons.min.js
86 ms
js_composer_front.css
90 ms
jquery.form.min.js
88 ms
scripts.js
91 ms
sbp-lazy-load.min.js
91 ms
jquery.royalslider.js
258 ms
plugins.min.js
259 ms
desktop-tablet.min.js
101 ms
desktop.min.js
102 ms
main.min.js
140 ms
js_composer_front.js
137 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.js
137 ms
jquery.easing.pack.js
138 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
137 ms
collect
28 ms
inapp1.jpg
268 ms
blank.gif
271 ms
Application_Services-e1407757780913.png
270 ms
Product_Engineering-e1407757858480.png
268 ms
Mobility_Solutions1-e1407757092758.png
287 ms
Programing_Services-e1407757899650.png
270 ms
QA_Services-e1407757962504.png
271 ms
Design_Services-e1407757400922.png
272 ms
HEI1-241x150.jpg
273 ms
WunSysLLC_VirtualWorkspace3-267x150.jpg
286 ms
job_portal_app-240x150.jpg
271 ms
discount_program_app-287x150.jpg
272 ms
mobileworks-282x150.jpg
273 ms
sales_mktg_tool-198x150.jpg
273 ms
snapcuts-281x150.jpg
273 ms
hvac_showroom-185x150.jpg
274 ms
duke_photography-213x150.jpg
274 ms
ats-250x150.jpg
275 ms
customerp-263x150.jpg
274 ms
workmanagementsoftware-204x150.jpg
276 ms
CMMS-232x150.jpg
275 ms
Webcorp-199x150.jpg
276 ms
qa_tool-211x150.jpg
276 ms
project1-278x150.jpg
276 ms
giftsontime-273x150.jpg
277 ms
bob-50x50.jpg
277 ms
olga-nemcova-50x50.jpg
277 ms
matthew-tonken-50x50.jpg
277 ms
cliff-mcbride-50x50.jpg
278 ms
randy-brous-50x50.jpg
278 ms
sanjay-50x50.jpg
278 ms
Logo2.png
279 ms
Logo3.png
279 ms
Logo4.png
279 ms
Logo6.png
278 ms
skin.css
178 ms
Logo5.png
125 ms
Logo1.png
124 ms
logo_180x752.png
124 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
44 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
44 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTRa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
77 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
78 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
27 ms
inapp.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
inapp.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
inapp.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inapp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Inapp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
inapp.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Inapp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: