5.8 sec in total
516 ms
4.6 sec
664 ms
Click here to check amazing In Check content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about incheck.net
Pre-employment background check services provide peace of mind for your hiring decisions. Complete, timely, accurate solutions for you. Get started today!
Visit incheck.netWe analyzed Incheck.net page load time and found that the first response time was 516 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
incheck.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value7.6 s
3/100
25%
Value7.0 s
32/100
10%
Value950 ms
29/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value14.3 s
9/100
10%
516 ms
1811 ms
232 ms
67 ms
134 ms
Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Incheck.net, 55% (58 requests) were made to Inchecksolutions.com and 8% (8 requests) were made to D.adroll.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Inchecksolutions.com.
Page size can be reduced by 205.3 kB (11%)
1.9 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Incheck.net main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 96.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. In Check images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 9.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 92.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Incheck.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 92.4 kB or 45% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (75%)
88
22
The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of In Check. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
incheck.net
516 ms
www.inchecksolutions.com
1811 ms
iubenda_cs.js
232 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
67 ms
style.min.css
134 ms
all.min.css
234 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
160 ms
26249-layout.css
162 ms
cleantalk-public.min.css
231 ms
dashicons.min.css
228 ms
frontend.css
289 ms
style.css
252 ms
frontend.min.css
377 ms
flatpickr.min.css
249 ms
select2.min.css
285 ms
v4-shims.min.css
277 ms
d811d818774ae267c2d4ae6d0107e0b3-layout-bundle.css
346 ms
wpp.css
392 ms
jquery.magnificpopup.min.css
392 ms
base.min.css
386 ms
skin-61f317ee283a8.css
368 ms
style.css
410 ms
animate.min.css
419 ms
css
281 ms
jquery.min.js
470 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
412 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
407 ms
apbct-public-bundle.min.js
409 ms
flatpickr.min.js
414 ms
select2.min.js
466 ms
wpp.min.js
466 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
411 ms
masonry.min.js
412 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
463 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
663 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
667 ms
26249-layout.js
664 ms
20409953.js
724 ms
frontend.min.js
663 ms
jquery.ba-throttle-debounce.min.js
644 ms
33b31f709a393d785d1163d548d63a11-layout-bundle.js
646 ms
jquery.magnificpopup.min.js
616 ms
core-en.js
291 ms
theme.min.js
524 ms
hotjar-2706850.js
365 ms
gtm.js
603 ms
ss.js
604 ms
lftracker_v1_lYNOR8x2Vyv4WQJZ.js
603 ms
aa8e30a421741b8f7aadf131a27f74a9.png
252 ms
Logo-InCheck-AMP.png
257 ms
Incheck-Solutions-Custom-Background-Checks.png
256 ms
InCheck-Solutions-Hire-Confidently.png
244 ms
Background-Check-Fingerprint-Icon.png
238 ms
Health-Screening-Icon.png
237 ms
License-Verification-Icon.png
271 ms
Accreditation-Logo-2-WHITE-transparent_PBSA-1024x841-1.png
271 ms
InCheck-Solutions-PBSA-Accredited-FCRA-Compliant-.jpg
273 ms
Hospital-Hallway.png
269 ms
2021-BD_EnterpriseSCREENING-banner.jpg
481 ms
InCheck_2022Kiehl_Morafcik_Gallion_3-scaled-landscape.jpg
547 ms
DEI-3.jpg
328 ms
EEOC.jpg
326 ms
Logo-InCheck@2x-300x57.png
326 ms
logo-pbsa-90x74-1.png
326 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
253 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
319 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
547 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
547 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
423 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
249 ms
modules.21c2ce197b1deec7582e.js
481 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
204 ms
insight.min.js
498 ms
collectedforms.js
484 ms
20409953.js
448 ms
20409953.js
489 ms
box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html
261 ms
analytics.js
394 ms
js
123 ms
js
172 ms
roundtrip.js
140 ms
koi
295 ms
tr.lfeeder.com
389 ms
conversion_async.js
351 ms
visit-data
608 ms
index.js
63 ms
7UYEY6MZ7FAEXCKWKBFWUK
107 ms
collect
33 ms
collect
43 ms
142 ms
Z53YHIMYHJEFHDNEZIYZZJ.js
4 ms
out
8 ms
out
5 ms
out
8 ms
out
10 ms
out
13 ms
out
10 ms
pixel
76 ms
sync
18 ms
pixel
19 ms
sd
60 ms
bounce
39 ms
in
4 ms
37 ms
16 ms
incheck.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
incheck.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
incheck.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Incheck.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Incheck.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
incheck.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of In Check. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: