Report Summary

  • 79

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

Page Load Speed

7.7 sec in total

First Response

1.5 sec

Resources Loaded

5.4 sec

Page Rendered

816 ms

incomesurfer.com screenshot

About Website

Visit incomesurfer.com now to see the best up-to-date Incomesurfer content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about incomesurfer.com

Visit incomesurfer.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Incomesurfer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

incomesurfer.com performance score

79

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

69/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

82/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.105

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.incomesurfer.com

1529 ms

shareaholic.js

22 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

148 ms

form_style.css

400 ms

css

75 ms

Our browser made a total of 124 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 15% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Incomesurfer.com, 6% (8 requests) were made to Dsum-sec.casalemedia.com and 5% (6 requests) were made to Px.owneriq.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Incomesurfer.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (58%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

741.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Incomesurfer.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 216.2 kB

  • Original 245.8 kB
  • After minification 244.3 kB
  • After compression 29.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 216.2 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 29.7 kB

  • Original 360.6 kB
  • After minification 331.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Incomesurfer images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 739.9 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 371.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 739.9 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 37.3 kB

  • Original 46.4 kB
  • After minification 36.3 kB
  • After compression 9.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Incomesurfer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 37.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 76 (67%)

Requests Now

113

After Optimization

37

The browser has sent 113 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Incomesurfer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

incomesurfer.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

incomesurfer.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

incomesurfer.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Incomesurfer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Incomesurfer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Incomesurfer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: