Tools & Wizards About Us
incrafttechnologies.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 46% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

incrafttechnologies.com

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

222 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

439 ms

incrafttechnologies.com screenshot

About Website

Visit incrafttechnologies.com now to see the best up-to-date Incrafttechnologies content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about incrafttechnologies.com

Incraft Technologies, Incraft, Pune IT Company, Web Development company in Pune, Android Development Company in pune, JAVA Development company in pune, ERP Development Company in Pune, India, Maharash...

Visit incrafttechnologies.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Incrafttechnologies.com page load time and found that the first response time was 222 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

incrafttechnologies.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value350 ms

74/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.074

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.0 s

34/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

incrafttechnologies.com

222 ms

bootstrap.css

139 ms

font-awesome.min.css

137 ms

animate.min.css

145 ms

flexslider.css

136 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Incrafttechnologies.com, 9% (3 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (603 ms) belongs to the original domain Incrafttechnologies.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 766.3 kB (42%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Incrafttechnologies.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 973.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 28.8 kB

  • Original 34.6 kB
  • After minification 19.9 kB
  • After compression 5.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.7 kB, which is 43% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 301.6 kB

  • Original 973.3 kB
  • After minification 671.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Incrafttechnologies needs image optimization as it can save up to 301.6 kB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 412.0 kB

  • Original 739.8 kB
  • After minification 739.5 kB
  • After compression 327.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 412.0 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 23.8 kB

  • Original 69.8 kB
  • After minification 69.8 kB
  • After compression 45.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Incrafttechnologies.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.8 kB or 34% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (61%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Incrafttechnologies. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

incrafttechnologies.com

incrafttechnologies.com

222 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

139 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

137 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

145 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

136 ms

style.css

style.css

204 ms

poppins.css

poppins.css

136 ms

lato.css

lato.css

209 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

46 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

404 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

224 ms

owl-carousel-settings.js

owl-carousel-settings.js

206 ms

jquery.flexslider.js

jquery.flexslider.js

333 ms

mini-grid.js

mini-grid.js

334 ms

settings.js

settings.js

334 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

369 ms

featherlight.min.js

featherlight.min.js

335 ms

map-settings.js

map-settings.js

370 ms

forms.js

forms.js

369 ms

animation.js

animation.js

368 ms

top-logo.png

top-logo.png

370 ms

banner-1.png

banner-1.png

603 ms

banner-2.png

banner-2.png

473 ms

software.png

software.png

537 ms

key-skills.png

key-skills.png

472 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

145 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

17 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

225 ms

banner-bg.jpg

banner-bg.jpg

448 ms

fun-fact.jpg

fun-fact.jpg

323 ms

download-app.jpg

download-app.jpg

582 ms

rum.js

rum.js

72 ms

ads

ads

96 ms

fontawesome-webfont5b62.woff

fontawesome-webfont5b62.woff

250 ms

Accessibility Review

incrafttechnologies.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

incrafttechnologies.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

incrafttechnologies.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Incrafttechnologies.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Incrafttechnologies.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

incrafttechnologies.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Incrafttechnologies. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: