4.4 sec in total
1.1 sec
2.6 sec
709 ms
Welcome to indesign.jewelry homepage info - get ready to check Indesign best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about indesign.jewelry
Stories and Styles of Fine Jewelry Design
Visit indesign.jewelryWe analyzed Indesign.jewelry page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
indesign.jewelry performance score
1110 ms
119 ms
117 ms
25 ms
118 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Indesign.jewelry, 9% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Indesign.jewelry.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (25%)
4.9 MB
3.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Indesign.jewelry main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 137.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 137.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 81.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Indesign images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 739.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 739.6 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 255.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Indesign.jewelry needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 255.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (59%)
59
24
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Indesign. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
indesign.jewelry
1110 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
119 ms
layerslider.css
117 ms
css
25 ms
settings.css
118 ms
css
36 ms
css
62 ms
css
43 ms
settings.css
175 ms
ethos.css
424 ms
css
44 ms
Defaults.css
129 ms
greensock.js
225 ms
jquery.js
262 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
155 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
203 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
198 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-packed.js
261 ms
frontend.js
240 ms
lightbox.js
240 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
332 ms
jquery.themepunch.essential.min.js
383 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
351 ms
x-head.min.js
296 ms
cs-head.min.js
303 ms
modal.min.js
339 ms
pinit.js
351 ms
load.sumome.com
338 ms
envira.css
300 ms
main.js
307 ms
x-body.min.js
318 ms
cs-body.min.js
484 ms
wp-embed.min.js
484 ms
envira-min.js
485 ms
analytics.js
12 ms
concrete_seamless.png
171 ms
personal-style-collage.jpg
125 ms
march-madness-collage-no-headline.jpg
165 ms
Danielle-Miele-and-Barbara-Palumbo-1.jpg
168 ms
Cedric-Charlier-intro-pic.jpg
158 ms
model-atelier-versace-1.jpg
112 ms
mike-todd-with-elizabeth-taylor.jpg
618 ms
indesign-jewelry-logo.jpg
157 ms
indesign-awards-public-voting-ad.jpg
222 ms
indesign-subscription-offer.jpg
161 ms
jennifergandia-640x480_c.jpg
619 ms
Bethbernsteinsarm-640x480_c.jpg
619 ms
Masha-Shapiro-640x480_c.jpg
617 ms
Rachel-Olmi-arm-640x480_c.jpg
618 ms
Debbie-Gaelens-diamond-cartier-bracelets-640x480_c.jpg
617 ms
samantha-knightsarmIMG_8717-640x480_c.jpg
621 ms
Eden-Daniles-1-640x480_c.jpg
620 ms
collect
42 ms
pinit_main.js
29 ms
4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf
49 ms
BTu4SsVveqk58cdYjlaM9g.ttf
51 ms
vDvcuXwZxUMLuTfuLrSLpA.ttf
52 ms
zpv3sOKAbMf4wff105oLjw.ttf
50 ms
5pEc4QKTMA2oB4Hi9NkS4w.ttf
51 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
513 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nk1QiopyrnwRtPsQZ8jWT9Y.ttf
49 ms
2ThursdayBornNecklaces-1.jpg
516 ms
vintage-victorian-secret.jpg
514 ms
ID-01-16-Glamour-SarahHyland.jpg
516 ms
count.js
376 ms
279 ms
count-data.js
54 ms
Hillary-Swank-covershot.jpg
154 ms
indesign.jewelry SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Indesign.jewelry can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Indesign.jewelry main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
indesign.jewelry
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Indesign. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: