2.6 sec in total
318 ms
1.9 sec
358 ms
Visit indianaresurfacing.com now to see the best up-to-date Indiana Resurfacing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about indianaresurfacing.com
When it comes to Indianapolis bathtub resurfacing, tile, fiberglass & countertop resurfacing, call the experts at Indiana Resurfacing for a FREE estimate!
Visit indianaresurfacing.comWe analyzed Indianaresurfacing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 318 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
indianaresurfacing.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value12.0 s
0/100
25%
Value6.8 s
35/100
10%
Value170 ms
92/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value9.7 s
28/100
10%
318 ms
292 ms
32 ms
226 ms
230 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Indianaresurfacing.com, 14% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (834 ms) belongs to the original domain Indianaresurfacing.com.
Page size can be reduced by 211.4 kB (13%)
1.6 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Indianaresurfacing.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 168.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Indiana Resurfacing needs image optimization as it can save up to 168.8 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 446 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Indianaresurfacing.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (63%)
30
11
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Indiana Resurfacing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.indianaresurfacing.com
318 ms
style.min.css
292 ms
all.min.css
32 ms
jquery.magnificpopup.min.css
226 ms
10-layout.css
230 ms
foundation-icons.css
34 ms
bef0404e561197d7c59866586acb95dc-layout-bundle.css
228 ms
bootstrap.min.css
24 ms
skin-652ed7447f992.css
240 ms
css
35 ms
jquery.min.js
311 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
431 ms
email-decode.min.js
231 ms
css
41 ms
jquery.magnificpopup.min.js
511 ms
10-layout.js
511 ms
jquery.imagesloaded.min.js
511 ms
jquery.ba-throttle-debounce.min.js
543 ms
8a56f84d3514841c0b5bf42599b215cd-layout-bundle.js
653 ms
bootstrap.min.js
715 ms
theme.min.js
721 ms
place
501 ms
IndyResurfacingLogo.jpeg
346 ms
indiana-bathtub-repair.jpg
336 ms
indiana-avantstone-countertops.jpg
508 ms
indiana-ez-tubs.jpg
498 ms
braoa.jpg
548 ms
resurfaced-bathtub.jpg
791 ms
indianapolis-bathtub-resurfacing.jpg
786 ms
marketable-media-footer.png
747 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
27 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
41 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
53 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
834 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
712 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf
62 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf
62 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf
62 ms
foundation-icons.woff
22 ms
before-resurfacing-200x300.jpg
796 ms
after-resurfacing-200x300.jpg
806 ms
js
45 ms
indianaresurfacing.com accessibility score
indianaresurfacing.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
indianaresurfacing.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Indianaresurfacing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Indianaresurfacing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
indianaresurfacing.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Indiana Resurfacing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: