Tools & Wizards About Us
infografikk.no screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    67% of websites

infografikk.no

Forside - Infografikk | Norges beste på Apple-B2B

Page Load Speed

8.5 sec in total

First Response

3.1 sec

Resources Loaded

5 sec

Page Rendered

321 ms

infografikk.no screenshot

About Website

Welcome to infografikk.no homepage info - get ready to check Infografikk best content for Norway right away, or after learning these important things about infografikk.no

Infografikk - Apple Premium Reseller

Visit infografikk.no

Key Findings

We analyzed Infografikk.no page load time and found that the first response time was 3.1 sec and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

infografikk.no performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.0 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value670 ms

44/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.921

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.2 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

infografikk.no

3129 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

352 ms

style.css

238 ms

team.css

361 ms

bootstrap-tooltip.css

246 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Infografikk.no, 10% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to I0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Infografikk.no.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 997.8 kB (30%)

Content Size

3.3 MB

After Optimization

2.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Infografikk.no main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 48.3 kB

  • Original 60.2 kB
  • After minification 57.7 kB
  • After compression 11.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Infografikk images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 361.5 kB

  • Original 497.7 kB
  • After minification 443.8 kB
  • After compression 136.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 361.5 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 581.8 kB

  • Original 660.3 kB
  • After minification 582.9 kB
  • After compression 78.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Infografikk.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 581.8 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (62%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

23

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Infografikk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

infografikk.no

infografikk.no

3129 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

352 ms

style.css

style.css

238 ms

team.css

team.css

361 ms

bootstrap-tooltip.css

bootstrap-tooltip.css

246 ms

templates.css

templates.css

248 ms

css

css

24 ms

style.css

style.css

699 ms

css

css

36 ms

style.css

style.css

1098 ms

style.css

style.css

488 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

491 ms

shortcodes_responsive.css

shortcodes_responsive.css

466 ms

magnific_popup.css

magnific_popup.css

479 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

815 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

958 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

610 ms

jquery.browser.js

jquery.browser.js

612 ms

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-packed.js

jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-packed.js

980 ms

jquery.easing.js

jquery.easing.js

736 ms

bootstrap-tooltip.js

bootstrap-tooltip.js

818 ms

custom.js

custom.js

861 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

840 ms

styles.css

styles.css

839 ms

frontend-builder-global-functions.js

frontend-builder-global-functions.js

889 ms

photon.js

photon.js

959 ms

jquery.uniform.min.js

jquery.uniform.min.js

958 ms

custom.js

custom.js

982 ms

idle-timer.min.js

idle-timer.min.js

1134 ms

devicepx-jetpack.js

devicepx-jetpack.js

9 ms

jquery.mobile.custom.min.js

jquery.mobile.custom.min.js

1136 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1209 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

1138 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1139 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.js

jquery.magnific-popup.js

1139 ms

frontend-builder-scripts.js

frontend-builder-scripts.js

1373 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1175 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

1233 ms

carousel.js

carousel.js

1234 ms

e-201611.js

e-201611.js

4 ms

ga.js

ga.js

116 ms

apr.png

apr.png

587 ms

xeroxp.png

xeroxp.png

599 ms

gold1.png

gold1.png

610 ms

logo.png

logo.png

154 ms

kursbanner.png

kursbanner.png

904 ms

fiber2.png

fiber2.png

682 ms

firmaleie.png

firmaleie.png

924 ms

printbanner-1.png

printbanner-1.png

871 ms

serverdrift-1.png

serverdrift-1.png

522 ms

kerio.png

kerio.png

776 ms

iphonebanner2.png

iphonebanner2.png

771 ms

servicesert.png

servicesert.png

682 ms

ibas.png

ibas.png

586 ms

kerio_partner.png

kerio_partner.png

586 ms

opusd.png

opusd.png

587 ms

OKI_logo.png

OKI_logo.png

610 ms

epson_logo.png

epson_logo.png

597 ms

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

51 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

52 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

53 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

51 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

51 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

50 ms

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

52 ms

ETmodules_v2_4.ttf

ETmodules_v2_4.ttf

744 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

76 ms

bx_loader.gif

bx_loader.gif

452 ms

controls.png

controls.png

456 ms

g.gif

g.gif

15 ms

Accessibility Review

infografikk.no accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

infografikk.no best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

infografikk.no SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NO

  • Language Claimed

    NB

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Infografikk.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Infografikk.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

infografikk.no

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Infografikk. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: