Tools & Wizards About Us
inforamp.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 83

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

inforamp.net

Home | Inter.net

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

104 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

134 ms

inforamp.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to inforamp.net homepage info - get ready to check Inforamp best content right away, or after learning these important things about inforamp.net

INTER.NET NO CONTRACT RESIDENTIAL PHONE AND INTERNET SERVICE offering no contract Phone and Internet service so you can try something different and better with absolutely no risk or obligation for one...

Visit inforamp.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Inforamp.net page load time and found that the first response time was 104 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

inforamp.net performance score

83

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

50/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.08

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.4 s

93/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

inforamp.net

104 ms

ca.inter.net

1007 ms

jquery-latest.min.js

22 ms

style.css

48 ms

mootools-core-1.4.5-full-compat-yc.js

120 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Inforamp.net, 83% (24 requests) were made to Ca.inter.net and 7% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Ca.inter.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 30.8 kB (8%)

Content Size

370.6 kB

After Optimization

339.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Inforamp.net main page is 370.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 241.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 14.2 kB

  • Original 19.6 kB
  • After minification 17.6 kB
  • After compression 5.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.2 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 12.0 kB

  • Original 241.2 kB
  • After minification 229.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Inforamp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 101.3 kB
  • After minification 101.2 kB
  • After compression 98.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 8.5 kB
  • After minification 8.5 kB
  • After compression 7.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inforamp.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (30%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

19

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inforamp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

inforamp.net

inforamp.net

104 ms

ca.inter.net

ca.inter.net

1007 ms

jquery-latest.min.js

jquery-latest.min.js

22 ms

style.css

style.css

48 ms

mootools-core-1.4.5-full-compat-yc.js

mootools-core-1.4.5-full-compat-yc.js

120 ms

mootools-more-1.4.0.1.js

mootools-more-1.4.0.1.js

136 ms

inter.net.js

inter.net.js

133 ms

Loop.js

Loop.js

119 ms

SlideShow.js

SlideShow.js

118 ms

basic.js

basic.js

118 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

42 ms

ga.js

ga.js

24 ms

page_bg-2.png

page_bg-2.png

80 ms

header_bg-2.png

header_bg-2.png

80 ms

inter.net-logo.png

inter.net-logo.png

80 ms

orange-arrow.png

orange-arrow.png

80 ms

new-tag.jpg

new-tag.jpg

105 ms

mega_horn.jpg

mega_horn.jpg

106 ms

arrow_right.gif

arrow_right.gif

106 ms

canada-map.jpg

canada-map.jpg

108 ms

phone-internet.jpg

phone-internet.jpg

107 ms

content_bg.png

content_bg.png

106 ms

did-you-know-eng.png

did-you-know-eng.png

124 ms

did-you-know-newt-eng.png

did-you-know-newt-eng.png

125 ms

service_01.png

service_01.png

107 ms

arrow_right_over.gif

arrow_right_over.gif

114 ms

service_02.png

service_02.png

124 ms

service_03.png

service_03.png

125 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

18 ms

Accessibility Review

inforamp.net accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

inforamp.net best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

inforamp.net SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inforamp.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Inforamp.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

inforamp.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Inforamp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: