Tools & Wizards About Us
infractor.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 95

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

infractor.org

Infractor :: Interactive Application for Multitouch Table realized through physical objects

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

216 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

168 ms

infractor.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Infractor content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about infractor.org

Interactive Application for Multitouch Table, based on the article database of the New York Times and uses physical objects on the interactive surface

Visit infractor.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Infractor.org page load time and found that the first response time was 216 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

infractor.org performance score

95

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

91/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

infractor.org

216 ms

prototype.js

8 ms

scriptaculous.js

17 ms

lightview.js

207 ms

lightview.css

196 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Infractor.org, 18% (8 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (662 ms) belongs to the original domain Infractor.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 80.4 kB (20%)

Content Size

409.5 kB

After Optimization

329.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Infractor.org main page is 409.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 275.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 15.2 kB

  • Original 19.2 kB
  • After minification 19.2 kB
  • After compression 4.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 17.3 kB

  • Original 275.2 kB
  • After minification 257.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Infractor images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 36.9 kB

  • Original 101.8 kB
  • After minification 97.9 kB
  • After compression 64.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 36.9 kB or 36% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 13.2 kB
  • After minification 9.3 kB
  • After compression 2.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Infractor.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (48%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

23

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Infractor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

infractor.org

infractor.org

216 ms

prototype.js

prototype.js

8 ms

scriptaculous.js

scriptaculous.js

17 ms

lightview.js

lightview.js

207 ms

lightview.css

lightview.css

196 ms

mainstyle.css

mainstyle.css

197 ms

builder.js

builder.js

4 ms

effects.js

effects.js

6 ms

dragdrop.js

dragdrop.js

10 ms

controls.js

controls.js

14 ms

slider.js

slider.js

9 ms

sound.js

sound.js

9 ms

bg_main.jpg

bg_main.jpg

205 ms

footer.png

footer.png

288 ms

logo.png

logo.png

102 ms

de.png

de.png

187 ms

h_background.png

h_background.png

195 ms

bg_halbtransparent.png

bg_halbtransparent.png

197 ms

video.jpg

video.jpg

203 ms

h_interaction.png

h_interaction.png

282 ms

infractor_1_kl.jpg

infractor_1_kl.jpg

390 ms

h_images.png

h_images.png

298 ms

infractor_2_kl.jpg

infractor_2_kl.jpg

303 ms

infractor_3_kl.jpg

infractor_3_kl.jpg

310 ms

infractor_4_kl.jpg

infractor_4_kl.jpg

378 ms

infractor_5_kl.jpg

infractor_5_kl.jpg

386 ms

infractor_6_kl.jpg

infractor_6_kl.jpg

398 ms

infractor_7_kl.jpg

infractor_7_kl.jpg

404 ms

infractor_8_kl.jpg

infractor_8_kl.jpg

415 ms

infractor_9_kl.jpg

infractor_9_kl.jpg

472 ms

infractor_10_kl.jpg

infractor_10_kl.jpg

487 ms

h_technology.png

h_technology.png

489 ms

prev.png

prev.png

499 ms

topclose.png

topclose.png

504 ms

close_large.png

close_large.png

521 ms

close_small.png

close_small.png

568 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

584 ms

inner_slideshow_stop.png

inner_slideshow_stop.png

589 ms

inner_prev.png

inner_prev.png

599 ms

inner_next.png

inner_next.png

605 ms

controller_prev.png

controller_prev.png

625 ms

controller_slideshow_stop.png

controller_slideshow_stop.png

662 ms

controller_next.png

controller_next.png

106 ms

controller_slideshow_play.png

controller_slideshow_play.png

101 ms

controller_close.png

controller_close.png

102 ms

Accessibility Review

infractor.org accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

infractor.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

infractor.org SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Infractor.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Infractor.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

infractor.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Infractor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: