Tools & Wizards About Us
infrastructureusa.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    57% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    61% of websites

infrastructureusa.org

Home - InfrastructureUSA: Citizen Dialogue About Civil Infrastructure InfrastructureUSA: Citizen Dialogue About Civil Infrastructure

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

612 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

275 ms

infrastructureusa.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to infrastructureusa.org homepage info - get ready to check InfrastructureUSA best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about infrastructureusa.org

InfrastructureUSA.org is citizen dialogue about civil infrastructure - all infra areas, any topic and every viewpoint. The Infra Blog. Infra Polls. Show Us Your Infra.

Visit infrastructureusa.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Infrastructureusa.org page load time and found that the first response time was 612 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

infrastructureusa.org performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.6 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,030 ms

26/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.7 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.infrastructureusa.org

612 ms

6a54d.css

31 ms

ga.js

43 ms

adsbygoogle.js

11 ms

2aae5.js

44 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Infrastructureusa.org, 9% (6 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (612 ms) belongs to the original domain Infrastructureusa.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 487.8 kB (38%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

801.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Infrastructureusa.org main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 666.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 25.2 kB

  • Original 36.4 kB
  • After minification 34.5 kB
  • After compression 11.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.2 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 7.8 kB

  • Original 456.1 kB
  • After minification 448.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. InfrastructureUSA images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 369.1 kB

  • Original 666.0 kB
  • After minification 666.0 kB
  • After compression 296.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 369.1 kB or 55% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 85.7 kB

  • Original 130.8 kB
  • After minification 130.3 kB
  • After compression 45.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Infrastructureusa.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 85.7 kB or 65% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (27%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

46

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of InfrastructureUSA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.infrastructureusa.org

www.infrastructureusa.org

612 ms

6a54d.css

6a54d.css

31 ms

ga.js

ga.js

43 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

11 ms

2aae5.js

2aae5.js

44 ms

098aa.js

098aa.js

80 ms

fd04b.js

fd04b.js

26 ms

jquery.jscrollpane.min.css

jquery.jscrollpane.min.css

41 ms

customcolors.css

customcolors.css

24 ms

rss-feed.js

rss-feed.js

123 ms

3b20c.js

3b20c.js

74 ms

e0a8b.js

e0a8b.js

199 ms

39445.js

39445.js

74 ms

devicepx-jetpack.js

devicepx-jetpack.js

18 ms

13d7d.js

13d7d.js

112 ms

e-201736.js

e-201736.js

18 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

92 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

76 ms

t_logo-a.png

t_logo-a.png

181 ms

header_decoration.jpg

header_decoration.jpg

83 ms

menu_decoration.jpg

menu_decoration.jpg

44 ms

home_but.jpg

home_but.jpg

44 ms

show_but.jpg

show_but.jpg

81 ms

views_but.jpg

views_but.jpg

82 ms

blog_but.jpg

blog_but.jpg

80 ms

polls_but.jpg

polls_but.jpg

80 ms

about_but.jpg

about_but.jpg

83 ms

resources_but.jpg

resources_but.jpg

83 ms

contact_but.jpg

contact_but.jpg

83 ms

fundersbanner-130px-fin-01.jpg

fundersbanner-130px-fin-01.jpg

83 ms

acec-banner-100px.jpg

acec-banner-100px.jpg

177 ms

asce-banner-100px.jpg

asce-banner-100px.jpg

84 ms

nybf-banner-100px.jpg

nybf-banner-100px.jpg

89 ms

aecom-banner-100px.jpg

aecom-banner-100px.jpg

89 ms

graef-banner-100px-sm.jpg

graef-banner-100px-sm.jpg

143 ms

hanson-banner-100px-sm.jpg

hanson-banner-100px-sm.jpg

141 ms

apl-banner-100px.jpg

apl-banner-100px.jpg

187 ms

Home1.jpg

Home1.jpg

188 ms

Home2.jpg

Home2.jpg

186 ms

Home3.jpg

Home3.jpg

187 ms

Home4.jpg

Home4.jpg

195 ms

fblogo.jpg

fblogo.jpg

186 ms

ytlogo.png

ytlogo.png

225 ms

flickrbutton.png

flickrbutton.png

195 ms

rss.jpg

rss.jpg

193 ms

footer-support.jpg

footer-support.jpg

193 ms

rssfeed.php

rssfeed.php

68 ms

ca-pub-8973441676940582.js

ca-pub-8973441676940582.js

170 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

166 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

117 ms

show_us_icon.jpg

show_us_icon.jpg

189 ms

show_us_title.jpg

show_us_title.jpg

189 ms

polls_icon.jpg

polls_icon.jpg

189 ms

polls_title.jpg

polls_title.jpg

189 ms

blog_title.jpg

blog_title.jpg

188 ms

views_title.jpg

views_title.jpg

200 ms

collect

collect

111 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

36 ms

rss-feed-style.js

rss-feed-style.js

37 ms

ads

ads

191 ms

osd.js

osd.js

21 ms

g.gif

g.gif

20 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

31 ms

rss-feed-style.js

rss-feed-style.js

19 ms

pla

pla

41 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

46 ms

http:/

http:/

10 ms

collect

collect

11 ms

collect

collect

18 ms

collect

collect

49 ms

Accessibility Review

infrastructureusa.org accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

infrastructureusa.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

infrastructureusa.org SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Infrastructureusa.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Infrastructureusa.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

infrastructureusa.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of InfrastructureUSA. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: