5.8 sec in total
408 ms
5.1 sec
326 ms
Click here to check amazing INPROGRESS content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about inprogress.us
Forsale Lander
Visit inprogress.usWe analyzed Inprogress.us page load time and found that the first response time was 408 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
inprogress.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value4.6 s
35/100
25%
Value7.8 s
23/100
10%
Value380 ms
70/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.1 s
64/100
10%
408 ms
3041 ms
300 ms
162 ms
458 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Inprogress.us, 37% (19 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Inprogress.us.
Page size can be reduced by 97.4 kB (38%)
256.6 kB
159.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Inprogress.us main page is 256.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 109.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.3 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 40.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, INPROGRESS needs image optimization as it can save up to 40.1 kB or 100% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 35.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 35.0 kB or 32% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inprogress.us has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (89%)
45
5
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of INPROGRESS. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
inprogress.us
408 ms
inprogress.us
3041 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
300 ms
style.min.css
162 ms
styles.css
458 ms
css
247 ms
genericons.css
199 ms
style.css
516 ms
jetpack.css
230 ms
jquery.min.js
242 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
220 ms
core.min.js
214 ms
mouse.min.js
224 ms
resizable.min.js
223 ms
draggable.min.js
228 ms
controlgroup.min.js
227 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
228 ms
button.min.js
227 ms
dialog.min.js
232 ms
connect.js
670 ms
style.css
676 ms
dashicons.min.css
192 ms
jquery-ui-dialog.min.css
192 ms
jscripts.php
655 ms
bootstrap.js
631 ms
platform.js
202 ms
photon.min.js
190 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
192 ms
index.js
744 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
846 ms
functions.js
846 ms
intersectionobserver-polyfill.min.js
863 ms
lazy-images.min.js
863 ms
jscripts-ftr-min.js
958 ms
wp-embed.min.js
187 ms
e-202240.js
189 ms
logo.png
424 ms
sdk.js
126 ms
wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js
296 ms
wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js
349 ms
wp-polyfill-url.min.js
347 ms
wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js
309 ms
wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js
336 ms
wp-polyfill-object-fit.min.js
369 ms
Genericons.svg
25 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
25 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf
114 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf
114 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
628 ms
sdk.js
101 ms
105 ms
inprogress.us accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
inprogress.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
inprogress.us SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inprogress.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Inprogress.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
inprogress.us
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of INPROGRESS. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: