4.2 sec in total
1.3 sec
2.7 sec
274 ms
Visit inrix.com now to see the best up-to-date INRIX content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about inrix.com
Shape the future of mobility with our transportation analytics solutions. Unlock the power of big data to make mobility smarter, safer, and greener.
Visit inrix.comWe analyzed Inrix.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
inrix.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
17/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value380 ms
70/100
30%
Value0.172
70/100
15%
Value8.6 s
37/100
10%
1256 ms
166 ms
164 ms
7 ms
488 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Inrix.com, 13% (9 requests) were made to Google.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Cse.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Inrix.com.
Page size can be reduced by 645.1 kB (29%)
2.2 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Inrix.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 287.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, INRIX needs image optimization as it can save up to 287.8 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 225.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 225.7 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 84.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inrix.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 84.5 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (48%)
63
33
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of INRIX. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
inrix.com
1256 ms
slick.css
166 ms
slick-theme.css
164 ms
jquery-latest.js
7 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
488 ms
simpleslider.js
184 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
272 ms
testimonials-widget.css
266 ms
prettyPhoto.css
380 ms
wp-video-lightbox.css
199 ms
swipebox.css
269 ms
wpfront-scroll-top.css
263 ms
css
25 ms
genericons.css
459 ms
style.css
554 ms
jquery.js
730 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
358 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
535 ms
video-lightbox.js
456 ms
jquery.swipebox.min.js
492 ms
front.js
535 ms
wpfront-scroll-top.js
545 ms
comment-reply.min.js
412 ms
functions.js
455 ms
slick.js
683 ms
slick-slider.js
465 ms
ga.js
45 ms
Connected_Car_Infographic.png
547 ms
home-background.png
534 ms
logo_inrix_tag.png
83 ms
navbutton.png
185 ms
INRIX_NavAds_ProductsV3_190x190.jpg
186 ms
INRIX_NavAds_IndustryV1_190x190.jpg
363 ms
INRIX_NavAds_ResourcesV1190x190.jpg
162 ms
INRIX_NavAds_190x190.jpg
183 ms
StaticGlobalParkingImage_Homepage.png
320 ms
slide3.png
725 ms
slide2.png
624 ms
Final_Map.png
626 ms
Home_Prod_ConnectedCar.png
399 ms
Home_Prod_AnalyticsApps.jpg
540 ms
Home_Prod_RTPTraffic.png
555 ms
BackToTop.png
622 ms
cse.js
29 ms
car.png
614 ms
tablet.png
617 ms
road.png
694 ms
tower.png
696 ms
enterprise.png
698 ms
ico-web-portal-final.png
702 ms
news.png
696 ms
cases.png
782 ms
cse.js
100 ms
__utm.gif
19 ms
collect
74 ms
previous.png
672 ms
next.png
661 ms
jsapi
36 ms
default+en.css
6 ms
default.css
38 ms
default+en.I.js
18 ms
default.css
33 ms
async-ads.js
56 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
28 ms
small-logo.png
15 ms
search_box_icon.png
15 ms
clear.gif
15 ms
inrix.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
inrix.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
inrix.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inrix.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Inrix.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
inrix.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of INRIX. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: