5.4 sec in total
202 ms
4.5 sec
693 ms
Click here to check amazing Integis content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about integis.com
Visit integis.comWe analyzed Integis.com page load time and found that the first response time was 202 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
integis.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
36/100
10%
Value7.9 s
3/100
25%
Value6.4 s
40/100
10%
Value950 ms
29/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.9 s
43/100
10%
202 ms
533 ms
224 ms
469 ms
476 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Integis.com, 83% (65 requests) were made to Falcon-pe.com and 9% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) relates to the external source Falcon-pe.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (12%)
10.3 MB
9.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Integis.com main page is 10.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 9.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 155.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 155.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Integis needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 14.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Integis.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (88%)
67
8
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Integis. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
integis.com
202 ms
falcon-pe.com
533 ms
global.css
224 ms
style-blocks.build.css
469 ms
frontend_blocks.css
476 ms
frontend_blocks_responsive.css
472 ms
style.min.css
486 ms
blocks.style.build.css
474 ms
css
48 ms
swiper-bundle.min.css
376 ms
spectra-block-positioning.min.css
490 ms
css
38 ms
uag-css-722.css
685 ms
sidebar-app.css
676 ms
css2
41 ms
style.css
674 ms
css2
40 ms
main.min.css
643 ms
forminator.min.css
570 ms
stackable.min.css
566 ms
wpforms.min.css
651 ms
jquery.min.js
704 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
733 ms
modal.js
794 ms
app.js
793 ms
dismiss.js
790 ms
swiper-bundle.min.js
870 ms
spectra-block-positioning.min.js
794 ms
faq.min.js
795 ms
uag-js-722.js
796 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
892 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
930 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
971 ms
react.min.js
927 ms
react-dom.min.js
1033 ms
hooks.min.js
986 ms
i18n.min.js
986 ms
url.min.js
1011 ms
api-fetch.min.js
1052 ms
dom-ready.min.js
1062 ms
a11y.min.js
1091 ms
deprecated.min.js
1152 ms
dom.min.js
936 ms
escape-html.min.js
816 ms
element.min.js
731 ms
is-shallow-equal.min.js
748 ms
keycodes.min.js
759 ms
priority-queue.min.js
762 ms
compose.min.js
812 ms
moment.min.js
888 ms
date.min.js
865 ms
html-entities.min.js
790 ms
primitives.min.js
687 ms
private-apis.min.js
687 ms
redux-routine.min.js
698 ms
data.min.js
746 ms
rich-text.min.js
749 ms
warning.min.js
719 ms
components.min.js
1055 ms
plugins.min.js
649 ms
sidebar-app.js
833 ms
main.js
668 ms
aoslight.js
725 ms
logo_bw.png
829 ms
PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA
3 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf
38 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf
73 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
74 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf
98 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf
97 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
93 ms
k3k6o8UDI-1M0wlSV9XAw6lQkqWY8Q82sJaRE-NWIDdgffTT6jRZ9xds.ttf
95 ms
falcon-home-video-3.mp4
2963 ms
top50.png
940 ms
flipped.png
1461 ms
beanstalk-dark.png
844 ms
Untitled-design-5.png
1414 ms
Untitled-design-3.png
1609 ms
integis.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
integis.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
integis.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Integis.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Integis.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
integis.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Integis. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: