11.8 sec in total
931 ms
10.3 sec
623 ms
Visit intensive.org now to see the best up-to-date Intensive content for Belgium and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about intensive.org
The International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is held every year in March.This meeting has become established as one of the largest in its field.
Visit intensive.orgWe analyzed Intensive.org page load time and found that the first response time was 931 ms and then it took 10.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
intensive.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.3 s
1/100
10%
Value9.2 s
1/100
25%
Value7.3 s
28/100
10%
Value3,210 ms
2/100
30%
Value1.093
1/100
15%
Value14.3 s
9/100
10%
931 ms
144 ms
168 ms
148 ms
2268 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Intensive.org, 14% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Intensive.org.
Page size can be reduced by 760.5 kB (68%)
1.1 MB
360.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Intensive.org main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 608.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 325.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 325.0 kB or 53% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 394.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intensive.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 394.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (74%)
73
19
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intensive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
intensive.org
931 ms
cookieconsent.min.css
144 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
168 ms
js
148 ms
bootstrap.min.css
2268 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
521 ms
style.css
2586 ms
font-awesome.min.css
616 ms
ionicons.min.css
2142 ms
flexslider.css
328 ms
owl.carousel.css
491 ms
magnific-popup.css
509 ms
responsivemultimenu.css
616 ms
css
142 ms
css
206 ms
css
206 ms
guardian.css
611 ms
jquery.popdown.css
692 ms
bootstrap-datepicker3.min.css
714 ms
vendor.css
704 ms
jquery.es-drawermenu.min.css
797 ms
style.min.css
816 ms
gtm.js
131 ms
logo.png
797 ms
play-arrow.png
703 ms
play-arrowb.png
714 ms
jquery.min.js
136 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1682 ms
responsivemultimenu.js
692 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
731 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1674 ms
isotope.min.js
1872 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
2001 ms
js
269 ms
jquery.scrollTo.min.js
1779 ms
smooth.scroll.min.js
1884 ms
jquery.appear.js
1952 ms
jquery.countTo.js
1965 ms
jquery.scrolly.js
1987 ms
plugins-scroll.js
2121 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
2068 ms
pace.min.js
2090 ms
main.js
3484 ms
multislider.js
2157 ms
jquery.es-drawermenu.js
2134 ms
jquery.guardian-1.0.min.js
2165 ms
jquery.validationEngine-en.js
3121 ms
jquery.validationEngine.js
3115 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
726 ms
analytics.js
58 ms
jquery.popdown.js
2309 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.min.js
2625 ms
collect
30 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
3061 ms
additional-methods.min.js
2292 ms
vendor.js
2751 ms
jqueryform.com.min2.js
2460 ms
css
16 ms
jqueryform.com.min2.js
2551 ms
index-banner-rspnsv.png
4645 ms
index-icon-15.png
2665 ms
index-icon-1.png
2750 ms
index-icon-2.png
2772 ms
index-icon-3.png
2684 ms
index-icon-5.png
2731 ms
index-icon-6.png
2812 ms
index-icon-7.png
2645 ms
index-icon-4.png
2080 ms
index-banner.png
7653 ms
index-icon-9.png
1723 ms
index-icon-10.png
1925 ms
index-icon-11.png
1911 ms
css
50 ms
icon
50 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff
127 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff
178 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
166 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
198 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
180 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff
179 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2060 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsI.woff
193 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsI.woff
192 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzQ.woff
178 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsI.woff
193 ms
KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKQ.woff
237 ms
tDbD2oWUg0MKqScQ6w.woff
226 ms
flUhRq6tzZclQEJ-Vdg-IuiaDsNa.woff
225 ms
common.js
4 ms
util.js
23 ms
stats.js
41 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
111 ms
intensive.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
<object> elements do not have alternate text
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
intensive.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
intensive.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intensive.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intensive.org main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
intensive.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Intensive. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: