5.4 sec in total
1.2 sec
3.9 sec
319 ms
Welcome to interliner.com homepage info - get ready to check Interliner best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about interliner.com
Visit interliner.comWe analyzed Interliner.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
interliner.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
67/100
10%
Value9.1 s
1/100
25%
Value4.9 s
65/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.018
100/100
15%
Value6.7 s
56/100
10%
1203 ms
281 ms
425 ms
350 ms
215 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Interliner.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Interliner.com.
Page size can be reduced by 590.7 kB (15%)
3.9 MB
3.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Interliner.com main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.7 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Interliner images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 388.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 388.1 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 147.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interliner.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 147.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (72%)
50
14
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interliner. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
interliner.com
1203 ms
normalize.css
281 ms
style.css
425 ms
prettyPhoto.css
350 ms
grid.css
215 ms
css
72 ms
css
84 ms
ultimate-tables.css
285 ms
jquery.dataTables.css
440 ms
styles.css
353 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
708 ms
modernizr.js
572 ms
superfish.js
495 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
571 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
739 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.js
786 ms
jquery.loader.js
644 ms
jquery.elastislide.js
860 ms
swfobject.js
866 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
1079 ms
jquery.twitter.js
922 ms
jquery.flickrush.js
853 ms
si.files.js
921 ms
audio.js
1208 ms
custom.js
1000 ms
style-frontend.css
876 ms
font-awesome.min.css
995 ms
sky-forms.css
939 ms
sky-forms-color-schemes.css
1059 ms
jquery.dataTables.min.js
1369 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1059 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1227 ms
scripts.js
1273 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1161 ms
chimpy-lite-frontend.js
1162 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
1377 ms
jquery.maskedinput.min.js
1448 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1355 ms
analytics.js
27 ms
collect
64 ms
collect
56 ms
interliner.png
424 ms
nav-divider.png
392 ms
loading.gif
644 ms
slider-041.png
1307 ms
slider-031.png
1301 ms
slider-021.png
1311 ms
slider-011.png
1355 ms
newsletter1.jpg
1165 ms
futurastdmed.otf
962 ms
globerreg.otf
1537 ms
progress.gif
1231 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
26 ms
nav-arrow.gif
990 ms
control-nav.png
78 ms
interliner.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
interliner.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
interliner.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interliner.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interliner.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
interliner.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Interliner. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: