6.1 sec in total
970 ms
4.6 sec
483 ms
Welcome to intermodalindepth.com homepage info - get ready to check Intermodal In Depth best content right away, or after learning these important things about intermodalindepth.com
Visit intermodalindepth.comWe analyzed Intermodalindepth.com page load time and found that the first response time was 970 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
intermodalindepth.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value8.1 s
2/100
25%
Value9.8 s
10/100
10%
Value150 ms
95/100
30%
Value0.331
34/100
15%
Value9.1 s
33/100
10%
970 ms
132 ms
353 ms
34 ms
203 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Intermodalindepth.com, 15% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (970 ms) belongs to the original domain Intermodalindepth.com.
Page size can be reduced by 310.7 kB (25%)
1.3 MB
942.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Intermodalindepth.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 650.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 197.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 197.0 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Intermodal In Depth images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 65.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 65.9 kB or 26% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intermodalindepth.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 43.9 kB or 34% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (88%)
57
7
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intermodal In Depth. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
intermodalindepth.com
970 ms
theme.css
132 ms
style.min.css
353 ms
css
34 ms
style.min.css
203 ms
bootstrap.min.css
379 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
252 ms
slick.css
206 ms
style.css
193 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
260 ms
owl.theme.default.css
267 ms
preloader.css
268 ms
plyr.css
315 ms
public.css
322 ms
default.min.css
330 ms
frontend.css
389 ms
front.bundle.css
382 ms
imageFilter.bundle.css
385 ms
css
27 ms
css
29 ms
backgroundSimple.bundle.css
392 ms
jquery.min.js
414 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
383 ms
blazy.min.js
382 ms
style.css
565 ms
owl.carousel.css
393 ms
sa-owl-theme.css
483 ms
animate.min.css
478 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
481 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
483 ms
runtime.bundle.js
483 ms
front.bundle.js
504 ms
lazyLoad.bundle.js
505 ms
webfont.js
27 ms
mailoptin.min.js
645 ms
jal.js
520 ms
bootstrap.min.js
536 ms
slick.min.js
644 ms
offscreen.min.js
644 ms
jquery.sticky.js
644 ms
navigation.min.js
643 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
581 ms
jquery.adsenseloader.min.js
519 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
510 ms
plyr.js
506 ms
machothemes.min.js
483 ms
functions.js
477 ms
frontend.js
513 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
509 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
462 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
622 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
467 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
448 ms
blog-header-1.jpg
456 ms
GTC-logo-header-159x100.jpg
332 ms
Screenshot-2023-04-20-135602.jpg
335 ms
GTC-header-13-1024x576.jpg
523 ms
image00064-300x200.jpg
738 ms
Lawrence_Gross_22G0046-300x300.jpg
395 ms
newsmag.ttf
360 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
21 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
39 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf
64 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
65 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf
65 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
47 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf
65 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
47 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
66 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf
66 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
66 ms
intermodalindepth.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
intermodalindepth.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
intermodalindepth.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intermodalindepth.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intermodalindepth.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
intermodalindepth.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Intermodal In Depth. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: