Tools & Wizards About Us
intriweb.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

intriweb.com

Webdesign & Online Marketing - INTRIWEB Webagentur aus Trier

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

740 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

465 ms

intriweb.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to intriweb.com homepage info - get ready to check INTRIWEB best content right away, or after learning these important things about intriweb.com

Professionell. Erfahren. Zuverlässig! Wir sind Ihr zuverlässiger Partner für erfolgreiches Webdesign, SEO und Onlinemarketing ➤ Jetzt informieren!

Visit intriweb.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Intriweb.com page load time and found that the first response time was 740 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

intriweb.com performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.2 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,620 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.201

61/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.6 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.intriweb.com

740 ms

style.css

179 ms

css

25 ms

css

38 ms

styles.css

190 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Intriweb.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (740 ms) belongs to the original domain Intriweb.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 862.8 kB (73%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

317.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Intriweb.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 578.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 35.2 kB

  • Original 44.5 kB
  • After minification 42.6 kB
  • After compression 9.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 22.3 kB

  • Original 114.2 kB
  • After minification 92.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, INTRIWEB needs image optimization as it can save up to 22.3 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 295.5 kB

  • Original 443.0 kB
  • After minification 403.9 kB
  • After compression 147.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 295.5 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 509.8 kB

  • Original 578.9 kB
  • After minification 497.1 kB
  • After compression 69.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intriweb.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 509.8 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (53%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of INTRIWEB. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.intriweb.com

www.intriweb.com

740 ms

style.css

style.css

179 ms

css

css

25 ms

css

css

38 ms

styles.css

styles.css

190 ms

layerslider.css

layerslider.css

190 ms

css

css

45 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

277 ms

bootstrap-responsive.css

bootstrap-responsive.css

190 ms

main.css

main.css

291 ms

theme.php

theme.php

396 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

267 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

367 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

273 ms

picturefill.min.js

picturefill.min.js

356 ms

greensock.js

greensock.js

454 ms

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

366 ms

layerslider.transitions.js

layerslider.transitions.js

382 ms

run.js

run.js

446 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

543 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

546 ms

devicepx-jetpack.js

devicepx-jetpack.js

3 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

546 ms

main.js

main.js

547 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

548 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

447 ms

ga.js

ga.js

110 ms

home-partner.png

home-partner.png

146 ms

intriweb2.png

intriweb2.png

137 ms

intriweb-retina2.png

intriweb-retina2.png

141 ms

blockquote.png

blockquote.png

137 ms

Webdesign.jpg

Webdesign.jpg

138 ms

btn_box_close.png

btn_box_close.png

139 ms

Suchmaschinenoptimierung.jpg

Suchmaschinenoptimierung.jpg

195 ms

Onlinemarketing.jpg

Onlinemarketing.jpg

196 ms

Komplettpaket.jpg

Komplettpaket.jpg

228 ms

benjamin-loewen1.jpg

benjamin-loewen1.jpg

227 ms

intriweb3.png

intriweb3.png

228 ms

intriweb-retina3.png

intriweb-retina3.png

228 ms

ico_footer_facebook.png

ico_footer_facebook.png

451 ms

ico_footer_twitter.png

ico_footer_twitter.png

453 ms

ico_footer_gplus.png

ico_footer_gplus.png

454 ms

btn_search.png

btn_search.png

454 ms

yVHpdQrmTj9Kax1tmFSx2qCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

yVHpdQrmTj9Kax1tmFSx2qCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

50 ms

f8OBjBbevvywgbyJOxlO7Q.ttf

f8OBjBbevvywgbyJOxlO7Q.ttf

51 ms

AwBqWF2kjhlybWamaKMPcaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

AwBqWF2kjhlybWamaKMPcaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

102 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

62 ms

menu_marker.png

menu_marker.png

95 ms

btn2top.png

btn2top.png

92 ms

Accessibility Review

intriweb.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

intriweb.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

intriweb.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intriweb.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intriweb.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

intriweb.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of INTRIWEB. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: