2.7 sec in total
278 ms
2.1 sec
273 ms
Click here to check amazing Invision Byte content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about invisionbyte.net
Visit invisionbyte.netWe analyzed Invisionbyte.net page load time and found that the first response time was 278 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
invisionbyte.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value3.3 s
70/100
25%
Value3.4 s
89/100
10%
Value160 ms
93/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value4.6 s
81/100
10%
278 ms
389 ms
353 ms
365 ms
156 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 22% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Invisionbyte.net, 73% (33 requests) were made to Community.invisionbyte.net and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (711 ms) relates to the external source Community.invisionbyte.net.
Page size can be reduced by 465.2 kB (71%)
659.8 kB
194.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Invisionbyte.net main page is 659.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 488.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.3 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Invision Byte images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 394.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 394.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 50.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Invisionbyte.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 50.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (72%)
43
12
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Invision Byte. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
invisionbyte.net
278 ms
www.invisionbyte.net
389 ms
ipb_styles.css
353 ms
ipb_common.css
365 ms
main.css
156 ms
prototype.js
504 ms
ipb.js
433 ms
scriptaculous-cache.js
439 ms
lightbox.js
360 ms
topic_view_content_hidden.png
235 ms
background.jpg
242 ms
primary_nav.png
168 ms
logo.png
166 ms
userbar.png
157 ms
key.png
164 ms
facebook.png
165 ms
twitter.png
318 ms
paste_plain.png
320 ms
help.png
324 ms
balloon-twitter.png
319 ms
content_bg.png
321 ms
secondary_nav.gif
392 ms
secondary_nav_link.gif
474 ms
award.png
475 ms
topic_button.png
475 ms
maintitle.jpg
473 ms
cat_left.gif
475 ms
cat_right.gif
543 ms
box_sides.gif
623 ms
w00t.gif
630 ms
wink.gif
633 ms
beach.gif
632 ms
box_footer.gif
637 ms
exclamation.png
694 ms
images.png
163 ms
money.png
160 ms
newspaper.png
162 ms
page_edit.png
163 ms
user_green.png
162 ms
downloads.png
313 ms
analytics.js
27 ms
loading.gif
701 ms
closelabel.gif
711 ms
collect
13 ms
ipb_print.css
81 ms
invisionbyte.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
invisionbyte.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
invisionbyte.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Invisionbyte.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Invisionbyte.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
invisionbyte.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Invision Byte. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: