2.7 sec in total
308 ms
2.2 sec
198 ms
Click here to check amazing IPhone Marks content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about iphonemarks.com
Visit iphonemarks.comWe analyzed Iphonemarks.com page load time and found that the first response time was 308 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
iphonemarks.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
84/100
10%
Value5.3 s
22/100
25%
Value4.7 s
69/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value1.146
1/100
15%
Value5.3 s
73/100
10%
308 ms
115 ms
187 ms
118 ms
189 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 39% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Iphonemarks.com, 13% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 9% (6 requests) were made to Start.speedymarks.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Amazon.speedymarks.com.
Page size can be reduced by 102.9 kB (47%)
218.4 kB
115.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Iphonemarks.com main page is 218.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 111.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.5 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, IPhone Marks needs image optimization as it can save up to 24.6 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 51.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 51.8 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Iphonemarks.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.4 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (47%)
62
33
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IPhone Marks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
iphonemarks.com
308 ms
starter.css
115 ms
starterNormal.css
187 ms
GoogleStorage.js
118 ms
Cookie.js
189 ms
CookieStorage.js
189 ms
DWRUtil.js
283 ms
starter.js
196 ms
iPhoneApps.js
327 ms
urchin.js
9 ms
favicon.png
481 ms
16x16-digg-guy.gif
295 ms
favicon.png
1517 ms
images.websnapr.com
273 ms
TellAFriend.png
384 ms
topGradient.png
92 ms
addButton.png
89 ms
logoNew.png
93 ms
loading.gif
92 ms
loginIcon.png
92 ms
logoutIconBW.png
93 ms
close4.png
178 ms
logoutIcon.png
179 ms
back_tl.png
180 ms
back_tc.png
181 ms
back_tr.png
184 ms
back_lc.png
185 ms
back_rc.png
267 ms
back_bl.png
269 ms
back_bc.png
272 ms
back_br.png
271 ms
AddToIPhoneMarks.png
349 ms
template.png
280 ms
appStoreBadge2.png
467 ms
safariPlusButton.png
481 ms
Wikipedia-favicon.png
59 ms
mobileIcon.png
545 ms
mobileIcon.png
405 ms
mobileIcon.png
483 ms
mobileIcon.png
486 ms
mobileIcon.png
490 ms
mobileIcon.png
416 ms
mobileIcon.png
483 ms
mobileIcon.png
507 ms
favicon.png
403 ms
widgets.js
158 ms
plusone.js
86 ms
cookieConsent.js
439 ms
mobileIcon.png
441 ms
fb.png
440 ms
__utm.gif
29 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
7 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
19 ms
fastbutton
117 ms
postmessageRelay
56 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
127 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
46 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
40 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
23 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
15 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
9 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
43 ms
jot
94 ms
check
65 ms
iphonemarks.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
iphonemarks.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
iphonemarks.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Iphonemarks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Iphonemarks.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
iphonemarks.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of IPhone Marks. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: