Tools & Wizards About Us
ipllivescore2016.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

ipllivescore2016.com

IPL live score 2016 - IPL Live score ball by ball

Page Load Speed

6.6 sec in total

First Response

890 ms

Resources Loaded

5.1 sec

Page Rendered

604 ms

ipllivescore2016.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ipllivescore2016.com now to see the best up-to-date IPL Live Score 2016 content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ipllivescore2016.com

Catch IPL Live score ball by ball updates on your IPL live score 2016 website

Visit ipllivescore2016.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ipllivescore2016.com page load time and found that the first response time was 890 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ipllivescore2016.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.ipllivescore2016.com

890 ms

shareaholic.js

33 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

249 ms

widget.css

471 ms

polls-css.css

494 ms

Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 32% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Ipllivescore2016.com, 8% (8 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 7% (7 requests) were made to Px.owneriq.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Ipllivescore2016.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 889.1 kB (46%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ipllivescore2016.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 831.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 236.5 kB

  • Original 263.9 kB
  • After minification 261.6 kB
  • After compression 27.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 236.5 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 874 B

  • Original 771.8 kB
  • After minification 770.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. IPL Live Score 2016 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 615.3 kB

  • Original 831.3 kB
  • After minification 830.8 kB
  • After compression 215.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 615.3 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 36.4 kB

  • Original 55.4 kB
  • After minification 44.4 kB
  • After compression 19.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ipllivescore2016.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36.4 kB or 66% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (73%)

Requests Now

85

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IPL Live Score 2016. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.ipllivescore2016.com

www.ipllivescore2016.com

890 ms

shareaholic.js

shareaholic.js

33 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

249 ms

widget.css

widget.css

471 ms

polls-css.css

polls-css.css

494 ms

css

css

33 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

485 ms

style.css

style.css

504 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

495 ms

www.ipllivescore2016.com

www.ipllivescore2016.com

569 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

976 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

721 ms

css

css

69 ms

polls-js.js

polls-js.js

733 ms

bjqs-1.3.min.js

bjqs-1.3.min.js

753 ms

bj-lazy-load.min.js

bj-lazy-load.min.js

748 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

812 ms

148a58f54a161057d104b61af320db1f.json

148a58f54a161057d104b61af320db1f.json

210 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

81 ms

honeycomb.png

honeycomb.png

394 ms

ipl-live-score-2016.png

ipl-live-score-2016.png

388 ms

Match-4-RCB-vs-SRH-Highlights.png

Match-4-RCB-vs-SRH-Highlights.png

1047 ms

Match-4-RCB-vs-SRH-Score-Update.png

Match-4-RCB-vs-SRH-Score-Update.png

983 ms

Match-3-%E2%80%93-KXIP-vs-GL-Highlights.png

Match-3-%E2%80%93-KXIP-vs-GL-Highlights.png

1025 ms

Match-3-%E2%80%93-KXIP-vs-GL-Score-Update.png

Match-3-%E2%80%93-KXIP-vs-GL-Score-Update.png

1044 ms

Match-2-%E2%80%93-KKR-vs-DD-Score-Update.png

Match-2-%E2%80%93-KKR-vs-DD-Score-Update.png

1215 ms

Match-2-KKR-vs-DD-Highlights.png

Match-2-KKR-vs-DD-Highlights.png

1274 ms

Match-1-MI-vs-RPS-Highlights.png

Match-1-MI-vs-RPS-Highlights.png

1555 ms

Match-1-MI-vs-RPS-Score-Update-1.png

Match-1-MI-vs-RPS-Score-Update-1.png

1574 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

1308 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

360 ms

shrMain.min.js

shrMain.min.js

192 ms

zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

353 ms

WyXtbLelkv62W9rJf1sl7ohV7ohV7ohV7ohV7ohV7RK3pFr+gVvaJX9Ipe0St6tV6tV+vVerVerVfr1Xq1Xq3X6DV6jV7T9Yr3qXifivepdPIfY1AvlQABUnNepwAA

WyXtbLelkv62W9rJf1sl7ohV7ohV7ohV7ohV7ohV7RK3pFr+gVvaJX9Ipe0St6tV6tV+vVerVerVfr1Xq1Xq3X6DV6jV7T9Yr3qXifivepdPIfY1AvlQABUnNepwAA

182 ms

slider-prev.png

slider-prev.png

1086 ms

slider-next.png

slider-next.png

1282 ms

collect

collect

96 ms

Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsDR-eWpsHSw83BRsAQElGgc.ttf

Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsDR-eWpsHSw83BRsAQElGgc.ttf

94 ms

b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nDokq8qT6AIiNJ07Vf_NrVA.ttf

b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nDokq8qT6AIiNJ07Vf_NrVA.ttf

96 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

93 ms

209 ms

pageview.gif

pageview.gif

45 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

131 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

341 ms

vglnk.js

vglnk.js

30 ms

partners.js

partners.js

87 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

32 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

32 ms

sholic.js

sholic.js

60 ms

beacon.js

beacon.js

33 ms

cms-sh2c.html

cms-sh2c.html

80 ms

eexelate.js

eexelate.js

48 ms

166 ms

ping_match.gif

ping_match.gif

7 ms

2964

2964

58 ms

ep

ep

79 ms

pixel

pixel

54 ms

rs

rs

28 ms

229 ms

pixel

pixel

21 ms

match-result

match-result

38 ms

usermatch

usermatch

130 ms

ep

ep

46 ms

pixel

pixel

17 ms

cm

cm

73 ms

Vu4OtMAoJVAAABJVrOoAAAGM%26621

Vu4OtMAoJVAAABJVrOoAAAGM%26621

176 ms

ca

ca

302 ms

i.gif

i.gif

297 ms

net.php

net.php

49 ms

ermcm

ermcm

113 ms

ping

ping

135 ms

pixel

pixel

38 ms

crum

crum

333 ms

rum

rum

233 ms

cfcm.ashx

cfcm.ashx

11 ms

rum

rum

314 ms

xrefid.xgi

xrefid.xgi

23 ms

pxj

pxj

90 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

116 ms

crum

crum

149 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

67 ms

domains

domains

57 ms

crum

crum

187 ms

xrefid.xgi

xrefid.xgi

8 ms

Match-4-RCB-vs-SRH-Highlights-150x150.png

Match-4-RCB-vs-SRH-Highlights-150x150.png

238 ms

Match-3-%E2%80%93-KXIP-vs-GL-Highlights-150x150.png

Match-3-%E2%80%93-KXIP-vs-GL-Highlights-150x150.png

248 ms

Match-4-RCB-vs-SRH-Score-Update-150x150.png

Match-4-RCB-vs-SRH-Score-Update-150x150.png

252 ms

Match-3-%E2%80%93-KXIP-vs-GL-Score-Update-150x150.png

Match-3-%E2%80%93-KXIP-vs-GL-Score-Update-150x150.png

607 ms

page.php

page.php

39 ms

hDvwL1_H7g-.css

hDvwL1_H7g-.css

176 ms

56WNbrUYLbL.css

56WNbrUYLbL.css

220 ms

q68gy-v_YMF.js

q68gy-v_YMF.js

301 ms

FJmpeSpHpjS.js

FJmpeSpHpjS.js

439 ms

0wM5s1Khldu.js

0wM5s1Khldu.js

437 ms

1bNoFZUdlYZ.js

1bNoFZUdlYZ.js

438 ms

I6-MnjEovm5.js

I6-MnjEovm5.js

41 ms

pQrUxxo5oQp.js

pQrUxxo5oQp.js

81 ms

SEO Factors

ipllivescore2016.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ipllivescore2016.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ipllivescore2016.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ipllivescore2016.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of IPL Live Score 2016. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: