Tools & Wizards About Us
ipmango.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 77

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

ipmango.com

IPMANGO

Page Load Speed

966 ms in total

First Response

219 ms

Resources Loaded

656 ms

Page Rendered

91 ms

ipmango.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing IPMANGO content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ipmango.com

Visit ipmango.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ipmango.com page load time and found that the first response time was 219 ms and then it took 747 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ipmango.com performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

83/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value930 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.081

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.6 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ipmango.com

219 ms

css

15 ms

style.css

52 ms

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

167 ms

main.js

87 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 15% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Ipmango.com, 27% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 12% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (219 ms) belongs to the original domain Ipmango.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 410.1 kB (62%)

Content Size

663.0 kB

After Optimization

252.8 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ipmango.com main page is 663.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 635.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 12.3 kB

  • Original 17.5 kB
  • After minification 17.0 kB
  • After compression 5.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.3 kB or 70% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 389.5 kB

  • Original 635.0 kB
  • After minification 631.4 kB
  • After compression 245.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 389.5 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 8.3 kB

  • Original 10.4 kB
  • After minification 8.4 kB
  • After compression 2.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ipmango.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (55%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IPMANGO. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ipmango.com

ipmango.com

219 ms

css

css

15 ms

style.css

style.css

52 ms

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

167 ms

main.js

main.js

87 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

37 ms

collect

collect

37 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

3 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSpS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSpS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

4 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzJS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzJS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf

5 ms

all.js

all.js

13 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

52 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

87 ms

41 ms

0sTQzbapM8j.js

0sTQzbapM8j.js

34 ms

0sTQzbapM8j.js

0sTQzbapM8j.js

52 ms

button.3ccb64e61d4c01fae12cd2b0ed9b2bab.js

button.3ccb64e61d4c01fae12cd2b0ed9b2bab.js

14 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

11 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

24 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

73 ms

tweet_button.f8c8d971a6ac545cf416e3c1ad4bbc65.en.html

tweet_button.f8c8d971a6ac545cf416e3c1ad4bbc65.en.html

22 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

47 ms

rs=AGLTcCOnDxwX8-LbpDmaxOBIoHm7W_kGNA

rs=AGLTcCOnDxwX8-LbpDmaxOBIoHm7W_kGNA

3 ms

971028622-postmessagerelay.js

971028622-postmessagerelay.js

19 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

29 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

3 ms

Accessibility Review

ipmango.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

ipmango.com best practices score

77

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

ipmango.com SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ipmango.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ipmango.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ipmango.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of IPMANGO. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: