Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 85

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    67% of websites

ipoget.com

IPO初値予想主観 IPOゲッターの投資日記

Page Load Speed

5.3 sec in total

First Response

731 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

582 ms

ipoget.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ipoget.com now to see the best up-to-date Ipoget content for Japan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ipoget.com

IPO投資だけでひっそりと3,000万円以上の利益を出しているIPO愛好家のIPO分析ブログです。IPO投資経験及びブログ運営期間は共に17年以上と経験だけは一人前の老舗ブログなのでIPOなど初心者向けの投資に関しては専門です。IPO初値予想にIPOスケジュール、IPO投資に必要な証券会社等のご紹介もしています。

Visit ipoget.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ipoget.com page load time and found that the first response time was 731 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ipoget.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value510 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.061

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.2 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ipoget.com

731 ms

common.css

363 ms

layout.css

364 ms

design.css

550 ms

mobile.css

576 ms

Our browser made a total of 116 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Ipoget.com, 28% (32 requests) were made to Srv2.trafficgate.net and 6% (7 requests) were made to Counter1-cdn.fc2.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Ipoget.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 380.1 kB (23%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Ipoget.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 73.4 kB

  • Original 91.2 kB
  • After minification 87.1 kB
  • After compression 17.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 20.4 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ipoget images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 224.6 kB

  • Original 341.2 kB
  • After minification 339.3 kB
  • After compression 116.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 224.6 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 61.6 kB

  • Original 72.9 kB
  • After minification 49.1 kB
  • After compression 11.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ipoget.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 61.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (45%)

Requests Now

99

After Optimization

54

The browser has sent 99 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ipoget. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ipoget.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ipoget.com best practices score

85

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

ipoget.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ipoget.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ipoget.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ipoget. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: