Report Summary

  • 6

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

iranargham.com

ایران ارقام

Page Load Speed

22.6 sec in total

First Response

4.6 sec

Resources Loaded

17.6 sec

Page Rendered

467 ms

iranargham.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Iranargham content for Iran. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about iranargham.com

ایران ارقام

Visit iranargham.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Iranargham.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.6 sec and then it took 18 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

iranargham.com performance score

6

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value23.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,600 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.487

17/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.4 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

iranargham.com

4605 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

616 ms

admin_icon.min.css

608 ms

styles.css

425 ms

styles-rtl.css

424 ms

Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (96 requests) were addressed to the original Iranargham.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Iranargham.ml. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Iranargham.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.4 MB (75%)

Content Size

4.5 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Iranargham.com main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 184.6 kB

  • Original 218.3 kB
  • After minification 214.3 kB
  • After compression 33.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 184.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 25.7 kB

  • Original 527.4 kB
  • After minification 501.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Iranargham images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 1.1 MB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB
  • After compression 375.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 2.1 MB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB
  • After compression 238.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Iranargham.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.1 MB or 90% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (65%)

Requests Now

99

After Optimization

35

The browser has sent 99 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Iranargham. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

iranargham.com accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role] values are not valid

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

iranargham.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

iranargham.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FA

  • Language Claimed

    FA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Iranargham.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Persian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Iranargham.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Iranargham. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: