2.5 sec in total
211 ms
2 sec
335 ms
Visit ireviewwatches.com now to see the best up-to-date IReviewWatches content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ireviewwatches.com
We are one of the leading watch review sites. Choose the best watch with our help! Our mission is to: find a reliable watch e-shop for you.
Visit ireviewwatches.comWe analyzed Ireviewwatches.com page load time and found that the first response time was 211 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
ireviewwatches.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
24/100
10%
Value6.2 s
11/100
25%
Value11.1 s
5/100
10%
Value10,710 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.034
100/100
15%
Value24.2 s
0/100
10%
211 ms
96 ms
139 ms
137 ms
148 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Ireviewwatches.com, 13% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Ireviewwatches.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (27%)
6.3 MB
4.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Ireviewwatches.com main page is 6.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 570.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, IReviewWatches needs image optimization as it can save up to 570.7 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 591.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 591.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 513.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ireviewwatches.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 513.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (65%)
54
19
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IReviewWatches. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ireviewwatches.com
211 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
96 ms
settings.css
139 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
137 ms
style.min.css
148 ms
renew.css
230 ms
renew.css
156 ms
css
26 ms
js_composer.css
174 ms
jquery.js
266 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
222 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
341 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
323 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
285 ms
x-head.min.js
317 ms
x-shortcodes-head.min.js
313 ms
formreset.min.css
333 ms
formsmain.min.css
337 ms
readyclass.min.css
427 ms
browsers.min.css
427 ms
jquery.form.min.js
428 ms
scripts.js
427 ms
x-body.min.js
428 ms
x-shortcodes-body.min.js
428 ms
wp-embed.min.js
507 ms
jquery.json-1.3.js
507 ms
gravityforms.min.js
508 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
507 ms
analytics.js
11 ms
logo.png
264 ms
slide_1_home.jpg
522 ms
%D0%A1%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BA-%D1%8D%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B0-2015-07-30-%D0%B2-13.36.05.png
1354 ms
transparent.png
291 ms
%D0%A1%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BA-%D1%8D%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B0-2015-07-30-%D0%B2-13.43.45.png
952 ms
%D0%A1%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BA-%D1%8D%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B0-2015-08-06-%D0%B2-2.06.48.png
1206 ms
slide_2_home.jpg
583 ms
slide_1_home.jpg
790 ms
slide_2_home.jpg
856 ms
slide_3_home.jpg
856 ms
collect
84 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
190 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzI3LH2FgLjViKkqswU-xtII.ttf
219 ms
pQ091WwCqK_i0BhMWeZ4BPesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
218 ms
font-awesome.woff
864 ms
8UIkryAMnYqDga6nPyU77_esZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
219 ms
dfds1.jpg
847 ms
2048x2048-white-solid-color-background.jpg
718 ms
loader.gif
723 ms
coloredbg.png
737 ms
ireviewwatches.com
763 ms
bullets2.png
760 ms
arrow_left2.png
791 ms
arrow_right2.png
825 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBgzzZlagSe_blz3aczwf9QY.ttf
42 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxr7nyIQarwPho2ll3DE8w6k.ttf
20 ms
EXoqRWqHxAo
68 ms
i-Nj4ebYoeg
165 ms
Y56dtbhLKTU
152 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
19 ms
www-embed-player.js
37 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
49 ms
ad_status.js
49 ms
QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
32 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
83 ms
ireviewwatches.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
ireviewwatches.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
ireviewwatches.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ireviewwatches.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ireviewwatches.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ireviewwatches.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of IReviewWatches. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: